Influence Analysis of Nozzle Size on Flowfield and Thermal Environment in Arc-heated Wind Tunnel

被引：0

作者：

Luo W.-Q. ^{[1
,2
]}

Liang J.-H. ^{[1
]}

Yang Y.-J. ^{[2
,3
]}

Zhao J.-S. ^{[2
]}

Sun H.-H. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Science and Technology on Scramjet Laboratory, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha

[2] Hypervelocity Aerodynamics Institute, China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang

[3] School of Astronautics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin

来源：

Yuhang Xuebao/Journal of Astronautics | 2021年 / 42卷 / 02期

关键词：

Arc-heated wind tunnel; High enthalpy flowfield; Nozzle size; Numerical simulation;

D O I：

10.3873/j.issn.1000-1328.2021.02.003

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

In order to obtain the influence of nozzle size on the test flowfield and the heat flux on the model surface in an arc-heated wind tunnel, the numerical simulation method is used to simulate and analyze the high enthalpy flowfield of the spherical cylinder calibration model with different sizes of conical nozzles for specific test parameters. The comparison of the flowfield characteristics and the heat flux on the model surface reveals that, under the condition of simulating enthalpy and stagnation point heat flux, the nozzle with small exit size requires lower arc heating power, and the ratio of airflow energy transferred to aerodynamic heat per unit section is lower. At different nozzle exit sizes, the thermodynamic nonequilibrium degree in the exit region, the mass fraction of oxygen atom after shock wave, the pressure in the region near the stagnation point, and the proportion of conduction heat flux and diffusion heat flux are all approximate, while with any sizes of nozzles their differences between the ground experiment and the flight are obvious. The difference between the inflow velocity, the stand-off distance of shock wave and the translational temperature on the stagnation line are obvious. The larger the nozzle exit size is, the more similar they are to the flight condition. © 2021, Editorial Dept. of JA. All right reserved.

引用

页码：159 / 166

页数：7

共 22 条

[1] Anderson J D., Hypersonic and high temperature gas dynamics, (1989)
[2] Cao Chen-yu, Wang Rui-xing, Xing Xiao-dong, Et al., Design and experimental investigation of integrated thermal protection structure containing phase change material layer, Journal of Astronautics, 40, 3, pp. 352-361, (2019)
[3] Liu Li-ping, Wang Guo-lin, Wang Yi-guang, Et al., Catalytic performance of C/SiC composites in high enthalpy chemical non-equilibrium flow, Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 39, 5, (2018)
[4] Zhu Guang-sheng, Nie Chun-sheng, Cao Zhan-wei, Et al., Research progress of aerodynamic thermal environment test and measurement technology, Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 33, 2, pp. 1-10, (2019)
[5] Zhang Song-he, Yang Yuan-jian, Wang Mao-gang, Et al., Studies and applications of thermal/wave-transmission test technique in arc-heated wind tunnel, Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 35, 1, pp. 141-145, (2017)
[6] Chen Mo, How to determine the scale ratio of wind tunnel test models by CFD-A leap in the design standard of wind tunnel test models from the perception to the reason, Journal of Astronautics, 28, 3, pp. 594-597, (2007)
[7] Candler G V., The computation of weakly ionized hypersonic flows in thermo-chemical nonequilibrium, (1988)
[8] Gnoffo P A, Gupta R N, Shinn J., Conservation equations and physical models for hypersonic air flows in thermal and chemical nonequilibrium, NASA TP 2867, (1989)
[9] Bradley M, Magee T., Flow models for hypersonic nozzles and shock waves with chemical and vibrational nonequilibrium, The 33rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, (1995)
[10] Knight D, Olivier C, Austin J, Et al., Assessment of predictive capabilities for aerodynamic heating in hypersonic flow, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 90, pp. 39-53, (2017)

← 1 2 3 →