5-Item sino-nasal outcome test and 22-item sino-nasal outcome test relationship with endoscopic and radiologic scores in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

被引:3
|
作者
Misirovs, Rasads [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chan, Rory [1 ,2 ]
Lipworth, Brian [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dundee, Ninewells Hosp & Med Sch, Tayside Rhinol Megaclin, Dundee DD1 9SY, Scotland
[2] Univ Dundee, Ninewells Hosp & Med Sch, Scottish Ctr Resp Res, Dundee DD1 9SY, Scotland
[3] Riga Stradins Univ, Dept Doctoral Studies, Riga, Latvia
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.anai.2023.11.011
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: The 22 -item sino-nasal outcome test (SNOT -22) is a frequently used patient -recorded outcome measure in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNPs). Objective findings of nasal polyps and paranasal sinus inflammation are frequently graded using nasal polyp score (NPS) and Lund -Mackay Score (LMS), respectively. Objective: To evaluate a novel, abbreviated, rhinology-focused, five -domain SNOT -5 questionnaire because we had anecdotally noticed a relative disconnect between SNOT -22 and endoscopy and imaging scores. Methods: We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional, single -center review of patients with CRSwNPs who had filled out a SNOT -22, along with post hoc-derived SNOT -5 scores, which were then assessed in relation to NPS and LMS. Results: A total of 129 patients were included in the analysis. SNOT -5 but not SNOT -22 scores significantly correlated vs either NPS (P < .005) and LMS (P < .001), whereas only SNOT -5 differed significantly when comparing the cohort's lowest and highest tertiles for mean LMS: 11.8 vs 16.8 (95% CI, 1.5-8.4; P < .01) and for mean NPS 12.4 vs 15.6 (95% CI, 0.5-5.9; P < .05). Conclusion: In a retrospective, real -life cohort study of CRSwNP, there was a relative disconnect between the significant association of SNOT -5 but not SNOT -22 in relation to objective endoscopy and imaging measures. We, therefore, propose that further prospective intervention studies are indicated in CRSwNP to evaluate the SNOT -5 score including establishing the minimal clinically important difference. (c) 2023 American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY -NC -ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 367
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A validated model for the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test subdomain structure in chronic rhinosinusitis
    Feng, Allen L.
    Wesely, Nicholas C.
    Hoehle, Lloyd P.
    Phillips, Katie M.
    Yamasaki, Alisa
    Campbell, Adam P.
    Gregorio, Luciano L.
    Killeen, Thomas E.
    Caradonna, David S.
    Meier, Josh C.
    Gray, Stacey T.
    Sedaghat, Ahmad R.
    INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2017, 7 (12) : 1140 - 1148
  • [2] Endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis: 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 5-year results
    Simmonds, Jonathan C.
    Paz-Lansberg, Marianella
    Scangas, George
    Metson, Ralph
    INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2022, 12 (03) : 257 - 265
  • [3] Analyzing the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test using item response theory
    Crump, R. Trafford
    Liu, Guiping
    Janjua, Arif
    Sutherland, Jason M.
    INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2016, 6 (09) : 914 - 920
  • [4] Psychometric Validation of a Moroccan Version of the 22-Item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test
    Adnane, Choaib
    Adouly, Taoufik
    Oubahmane, Tarek
    Zouak, Abdelhay
    Rouadi, Sami
    Abada, Reda Lah
    Roubal, Mohamed
    Mahtar, Mohamed
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2016, 155 (04) : 681 - 687
  • [5] The 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test accurately reflects patient-reported control of chronic rhinosinusitis symptomatology
    Gray, Stacey T.
    Phillips, Katie M.
    Hoehle, Lloyd P.
    Caradonna, David S.
    Sedaghat, Ahmad R.
    INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2017, 7 (10) : 945 - 951
  • [6] The predictive utility of the 22-item sino-nasal outcome test (SNOT-22): A scoping review
    Liu, Matthew
    Liu, Jeremy
    Weitzel, Erik K.
    Chen, Philip G.
    INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2021, : 83 - 102
  • [7] Minimal clinically important difference for subdomains of the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test in medically managed chronic rhinosinusitis patients
    Singerman, Kyle W.
    Phillips, Katie M.
    Sedaghat, Ahmad R.
    INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2022, 12 (09) : 1196 - 1199
  • [8] Differences in the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22 and visual analog scale symptom scores in chronic rhinosinusitis with and without nasal polyps
    Greguric, Tomislav
    Trkulja, Vladimir
    Baudoin, Tomislav
    Grgic, Marko
    Smigovec, Igor
    Kalogjera, Livije
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY, 2016, 30 (02) : 107 - 112
  • [9] Exploring possibilities for shortening the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) using item response theory
    Liu, David T.
    Phillips, Katie M.
    Speth, Marlene M.
    Besser, Gerold
    Mueller, Christian A.
    Sedaghat, Ahmad R.
    INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2022, 12 (02) : 191 - 199
  • [10] Baseline mucus cytokines predict 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test results after endoscopic sinus surgery
    Chowdhury, Naweed, I
    Li, Ping
    Chandra, Rakesh K.
    Turner, Justin H.
    INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2020, 10 (01) : 15 - 22