Review of the evaluation methods of equipment's contribution rate to system-of-systems

被引:1
|
作者
Luo C. [1 ]
Chen Y. [1 ]
Xiang H. [1 ]
Wang L. [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Equipment Management and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Engineering, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an
关键词
Contribution rate evaluation; Equipment system-of-systems; Operation capability; Operation effectiveness; Structure of system-of-systems;
D O I
10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2019.08.16
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The evaluation of equipment's contribution rate to system-of-systems is of great significance to equipment demonstration and construction of equipment system-of-systems. The concept and connotation of equipment's contribution rate to system-of-systems are analyzed systematically. The three evaluation aspects of equipment's structure contribution rate to system-of-systems, equipment's capability contribution rate to system-of-systems and equipment's effectiveness contribution rate to system-of-systems are mainly summarized. The existing problems and development trends of current theoretical methods are pointed out from the three aspects of the unity of evaluation background and dimension, the construction of evaluation method and model, and the application of evaluation results. The research can provide reference for the evaluation and application of equipment's contribution rate to system-of-systems. © 2019, Editorial Office of Systems Engineering and Electronics. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1789 / 1794
页数:5
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] You G.R., Chu J.T., Lv S.Q., Study on weapon system-of-systems, Military Operations Research and Systems Engineering, 24, 4, pp. 15-22, (2010)
  • [2] Stephen D.O., Daniel E.S., The resurgence of growth in the late 1990s: is information technology the story, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 4, pp. 3-22, (2007)
  • [3] Lin M., Wang Y., Wu G., Regional strategies for developing emerging industries of strategic importance in China, Journal of Science & Technology Policy in China, 4, 1, pp. 20-35, (2013)
  • [4] Zhou L.Q., Xia L.K., How R& D investments influence TFP growth: evidence from China's large and medium-sized industrial enterprises, Frontiers of Economics in China, 5, 4, pp. 537-558, (2010)
  • [5] Antonelli C., Quatraro F., The effects of biased technological change on total factor productivity: empirical evidence from a sample of OECD countries, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35, 4, pp. 361-383, (2010)
  • [6] Bjorkman E.A., Gray F.B., Results of distributed tests with integrated live-virtual-constructive elements: the road to testing in a joint environment, ITEA Journal, 30, 1, pp. 74-82, (2009)
  • [7] Kometer M.W., Burkhard K., McKee S.V., Et al., Operational testing: from basics to system-of-systems capabilities, ITEA Journal, 32, 1, pp. 39-51, (2011)
  • [8] Cao Y.H., Zhou W.W., Gao H.M., Research on the design of weapon equipment combat test content, Journal of Equipment Academy, 25, 4, pp. 112-117, (2014)
  • [9] Guan Q.B., Yu X.H., Research on evaluation of equipment's contribution to system warfighting, Journal of Equipment Academy, 26, 3, pp. 1-5, (2015)
  • [10] Li J.C., Yang K.W., Zhang X.K., Et al., Equipment contribution degree evaluation method based on combat network of weapon system-of-systems, Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 13, 3, pp. 1-7, (2016)