How medical device instructions for use engage users

被引:2
|
作者
Cherne N. [1 ]
Moses R. [2 ]
Piperato S.M. [1 ]
Cheung C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Core Human Factors, Inc., Bala Cynwyd, PA
[2] Core Human Factors, Ltd., Netanya
来源
Cherne, Naomi (cherne@corehf.com) | 1600年 / Allen Press Inc.卷 / 54期
关键词
Testing - Surveys - Risk assessment;
D O I
10.2345/0899-8205-54.4.258
中图分类号
X9 [安全科学];
学科分类号
0837 ;
摘要
Instructions for use (IFUs) often are used as risk control measures for medical devices with the potential to expose users or others to use-related hazards and hazardous situations that are not entirely mitigated by device design. In the authors’ extensive experience observing representative users interact with medical devices in simulated-use studies, individuals’ engagement with medical device IFUs varies widely. This variance raises questions regarding how various user groups use IFUs and the factors that make an IFU stronger or weaker for its intended users, uses, and use environments. An online survey was conducted to examine (1) first-time use of medical device IFUs, (2) how first-time use strategies vary across typical user groups for medical devices (e.g., patients, lay caregivers, and healthcare professionals), and (3) which design elements promote initial engagement with IFUs. The results showed that IFUs are used in a variety of ways, including as preparation before use, as guides during use, and as troubleshooting resources during use, as well as that IFUs are not used at all. Overall, the user groups tested responded similarly across all of the survey questions. Bullet point organization, figures, and logical flow were reported to be the most engaging design elements. Small font size and poor organization and flow were reported to be the least engaging design elements. IFU designers can use various usability testing methods to assess their assumptions regarding how a product’s users will use the IFU and to make the IFU more engaging. © Copyright AAMI 2020.
引用
收藏
页码:258 / 268
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Investigating how users engage with a pedometer app
    Asadzadeh, Parvin
    Rooksby, John
    Chalmers, Matthew
    UBICOMP'16 ADJUNCT: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 ACM INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON PERVASIVE AND UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING, 2016, : 612 - 617
  • [2] How to Use a Noninferiority Trial Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
    Mulla, Sohail M.
    Scott, Ian A.
    Jackevicius, Cynthia A.
    You, John J.
    Guyatt, Gordon H.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 308 (24): : 2605 - 2611
  • [3] How to Effectively Engage With Preclinical Medical Learners
    Tai, Andrew W.
    Sewell, Justin L.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 165 (03) : 529 - 533
  • [4] Medical Device Guidebook: A browser information resource for medical device users
    Clarkson, Douglas M.
    MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2017, 41 : 97 - 102
  • [5] How emergency managers engage Twitter users during disasters
    Xu, Zhan
    ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, 2020, 44 (04) : 933 - 950
  • [6] Real-time, appliance-level electricity use feedback system: How to engage users?
    Chen, Victor L.
    Delmas, Magali A.
    Kaiser, William J.
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2014, 70 : 455 - 462
  • [7] USERS GUIDES TO THE MEDICAL LITERATURE .6. HOW TO USE AN OVERVIEW
    OXMAN, AD
    COOK, DJ
    GUYATT, GH
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 272 (17): : 1367 - 1371
  • [8] How to engage medical students in chronobiology:: an example on autorhythmometry
    de Lama, MAR
    Lozano, JP
    Ortiz, V
    Sánchez-Vázquez, FJ
    Madrid, JA
    ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2005, 29 (03) : 160 - 164
  • [9] How Global Airports Engage Social Media Users: A Study of Facebook use and its Role in Stakeholder Communication
    Wattanacharoensil, Walanchalee
    Schuckert, Markus
    JOURNAL OF TRAVEL & TOURISM MARKETING, 2015, 32 (06) : 656 - 676
  • [10] Passion at first sight: how to engage users in social commerce contexts
    Carolina Herrando
    Julio Jiménez-Martínez
    María José Martín-De Hoyos
    Electronic Commerce Research, 2017, 17 : 701 - 720