EXPERIMENTAL AND THEORETICAL STUDY ON PULL-OUT CAPACITY OF JOINTS BETWEEN SELF-TAPPING SELF-DRILLING SCREWS AND DIFFERENT SUBSTRATES

被引:0
|
作者
Wang D.-Y. [1 ]
Xin Z.-Y. [2 ]
Ou T. [3 ]
Pan B.-X. [1 ]
Ye X.-J. [1 ]
Zhang Y.-S. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of civil Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou
[2] Zhuhai Envete Engineering Testing Co., LTD, Zhuhai
[3] Guangdong Architectural Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd, Guangzhou
来源
Gongcheng Lixue/Engineering Mechanics | 2023年 / 40卷 / 01期
关键词
aluminum substrate; experiment; pull-out capacity; self-tapping self-drilling screws; steel substrate;
D O I
10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2021.08.0608
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The mechanical properties of screw-substrate joints have become one of the key issues in the research of long-span metal roofing systems. Reliable connections are one of the important components to ensure the wind resistance of metal roofs. The mechanical properties of carbon steel screw and aluminum substrate (CSA joint), of stainless steel composite screw and aluminum substrate (SSA joint), and of stainless steel composite screw and steel substrate (SSS joint) were tested in details through totally 360 experimental samples. The damage failure modes of these three joint types are analyzed, the influence law of parameters on the pull-out capacity of joints is revealed, and the design and calculation equation of joint bearing capacity is established. The study results show that: under the two drilling modes, the three joint types show the failure mode that the screw and the substrate are loaded together, the damage and deformation behavior occur at the occlusal place, and then the screw is pulled out from the substrate. The pull-out resistances of the joints are the SSS joint, CSA joint and SSA joint in turn. The substrate thickness, screw diameter and pitch have the influences on the pulled-out capacity of the joints, especially for the substrate thickness and pitch. Under the same conditions, the influence of changing pitch on the bearing capacity of three types of joints is up to 94.54%. The proposed equation for calculating the bearing capacity of the three types of joints are in a good agreement with the experimental results. © 2023 Tsinghua University. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:190 / 200
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] XUAN Ying, XIE Zhuangning, Research progress on wind loads and wind resistance bearing capacity of large span metal roof structures, Journal of Building Structures, 40, 3, pp. 41-49, (2019)
  • [2] GU Ming, HUANG Peng, ZHOU Xuanyi, Et al., A study on wind loads and responses of Terminal 3 at Beijing Capital Airport, China Civil Engineering Journal, 38, 1, pp. 40-44, (2005)
  • [3] LIN Huiting, LYU Wenlong, Structural typhoon disaster and conceptual design of wind resistance, (2020)
  • [4] YU Jinghai, LI Luchuan, GAI Li, Et al., Experimental study of the wind uplift capacity of a metal roof system, Building Structure, 45, 17, pp. 83-86, (2015)
  • [5] WANG Haitao, WANG Jingfeng, Experimental study of wind resistance of metal roofing panels of large-span spatial structure, Journal of Hefei University of Technology (Natural Science), 39, 1, pp. 115-121, (2016)
  • [6] YU Jinghai, ZHAO Yuyang, JIANG Zhiyu, Et al., Tension Bearing capacity of key connections of standing seam metal roofing system, Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 36, 1, pp. 112-120, (2019)
  • [7] ZENG Xiangxin, Study of wind-uplift resistance capacity and wind-induced fatigue damage of the self-tapping screw-fastened metal roofing plate, (2015)
  • [8] SUN Ying, WU Tao, WU Yue, Parameter study on wind resistant performance of standing seam roof system with anti-wind clip, Engineering Mechanics, 37, 2, pp. 183-191, (2020)
  • [9] XU Qiuhua, WAN Tian, LIU Kai, Optimal design of strengthening wind exposure resistance of vertical whipstitch mental roofing board, Engineering Mechanics, 37, 7, pp. 17-26, (2020)
  • [10] LI Yuanqi, SHUAI Yiqun, SHEN Zuyan, Et al., Experimental study on tension behavior of self-drilling screw connections for cold-formed thin-walled steel structures, Journal of Building Structures, 36, 12, pp. 143-152, (2015)