Application of Different Zooming Strategies in Aero-Engine Simulation

被引:0
|
作者
Song F. [1 ]
Zhou L. [1 ]
Wang Z.-X. [1 ]
Zhang M.-Y. [1 ]
Zhang X.-B. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Power and Energy, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an
来源
Zhou, Li (zhouli@nwpu.edu.cn) | 1600年 / Journal of Propulsion Technology卷 / 41期
关键词
Aero-engine; Fully coupled approach; Iterative coupled approach; Multi-level model; Zero-dimensional model;
D O I
10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.190304
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In order to investigate the implement method with both fully coupled approach and iterative coupled approach and to study the differences between the two approaches, the two-dimensional fan model was built and integrated into the cycle analysis with fully coupled approach and iterative coupled approach to establish the multi-level model for turbofan engine. The differences of simulation results, calculation speed and operability between the two zooming strategies were analyzed. A comparison of the results obtained from the zero-dimensional engine model based on component default map and multi-level was presented. The results indicate that the iterative variables need to be adjusted based on the requirements of the two-dimensional fan model for boundary conditions in order to establish the multi-level model with fully coupled approach, and the result of zero-dimensional engine model is used to initialize the iterative variables to ensure the convergence of the multi-level model. As for iterative coupled approach, the key is the control of the data transfer between the two-dimensional fan model and the zero-dimensional engine model, and it is easier to carry out than fully coupled approach. When the computation converges, there is no difference in the results obtained from the multi-level models using different zooming strategies, but the calculation speed of the multi-level model with iterative coupled approach is faster. Compared with the result of the baseline model, the maximum difference in the thrust solved from the zero-dimensional engine model is bigger than 8.34%, and the maximum differences in the thrust and specific fuel consumption of the multi-level model are less than 3%, which means that the multi-level model can predict the engine performance more accurately. © 2020, Editorial Department of Journal of Propulsion Technology. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:974 / 983
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Claus R.W., Lavelle T., Townsend S., Et al., Variable Fidelity Analysis of Complete Engine Systems
  • [2] Nichols L.D., Chamis C.C., Numerical Propulsion System Simulation: an Interdisciplinary Approach
  • [3] Claus R.W., Evans A.L., Lylte J.K., Et al., Numerical Propulsion System Simulation, Computing Systems in Engineering, 2, 4, pp. 357-364, (1991)
  • [4] Lytel J., Follen G., Naiman C., Et al., 2001 Numerical Propulsion System Simulation Review
  • [5] Bala A., Poly-Dimensional Gas Turbine System Modelling and Simulation, (2007)
  • [6] Alexiou A., Tsalavoutas T., Introduction to Gas Turbine Modelling with PROOSIS, (2011)
  • [7] Lytle J.K., Multi-Fidelity Simulations of Air Breathing Propulsion Systems
  • [8] Lytle J.K., The Numerical Propulsion System Simulation: an Overview
  • [9] Charles L., An Overview of Three Approaches to Multidisciplinary Aeropropulsion Simulation
  • [10] Evans A.L., Follen C., Naiman C., Et al., Numerical Propulsion System's National Cycle Program