Multi-objective Optimisation Design of Water Distribution Systems:Comparison of Two Evolutionary Algorithms

被引:3
|
作者
Haixing Liu
Jing Lu
Ming Zhao
Yixing Yuan
机构
[1] SchoolofMunicipalandEnvironmentalEngineering,HarbinInstituteofTechnology
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In order to compare two advanced multi-objective evolutionary algorithms,a multi-objective water distribution problem is formulated in this paper.The multi-objective optimization has received more attention in the water distribution system design.On the one hand the cost of water distribution system including capital,operational,and maintenance cost is mostly concerned issue by the utilities all the time;on the other hand improving the performance of water distribution systems is of equivalent importance,which is often conflicting with the previous goal.Many performance metrics of water networks are developed in recent years,including total or maximum pressure deficit,resilience,inequity,probabilistic robustness,and risk measure.In this paper,a new resilience metric based on the energy analysis of water distribution systems is proposed.Two optimization objectives are comprised of capital cost and the new resilience index.A heuristic algorithm,speedconstrained multi-objective particle swarm optimization( SMPSO) extended on the basis of the multi-objective particle swarm algorithm,is introduced to compare with another state-of-the-art heuristic algorithm,NSGA-II.The solutions are evaluated by two metrics,namely spread and hypervolume.To illustrate the capability of SMPSO to efficiently identify good designs,two benchmark problems( two-loop network and Hanoi network) are employed.From several aspects the results demonstrate that SMPSO is a competitive and potential tool to tackle with the optimization problem of complex systems.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 38
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-objective Optimisation Design of Water Distribution Systems:Comparison of Two Evolutionary Algorithms
    Haixing Liu
    Jing Lu
    Ming Zhao
    Yixing Yuan
    Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology(New series), 2016, (03) : 30 - 38
  • [2] On the Integrity of Performance Comparison for Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimisation Algorithms
    Wilson, Kevin
    Rostami, Shahin
    ADVANCES IN COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS (UKCI), 2019, 840 : 3 - 15
  • [3] Robust design optimisation using multi-objective evolutionary algorithms
    Lee, D. S.
    Gonzalez, L. F.
    Periaux, J.
    Srinivas, K.
    COMPUTERS & FLUIDS, 2008, 37 (05) : 565 - 583
  • [4] Pareto Genetic Algorithms for Multi-objective Design of Water Distribution Systems
    Nicolini, Matteo
    ADVANCES IN HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING, PTS 1 AND 2, 2012, 212-213 : 664 - 670
  • [5] A Comparison of Preference Handling Techniques in Multi-Objective Optimisation for Water Distribution Systems
    Reynoso-Meza, Gilberto
    Alves Ribeiro, Victor Henrique
    Carreno-Alvarado, Elizabeth Pauline
    WATER, 2017, 9 (12):
  • [6] Hybrid genetic algorithms for multi-objective optimisation of water distribution networks
    Keedwell, E
    Khu, ST
    GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION GECCO 2004 , PT 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 3103 : 1042 - 1053
  • [7] Comparison of evolutionary multi objective optimization algorithms in optimum design of water distribution network
    Monsef, H.
    Naghashzadegan, M.
    Jamali, A.
    Farmani, R.
    AIN SHAMS ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2019, 10 (01) : 103 - 111
  • [8] Evolutionary multi-objective optimization in water distribution network design
    Farmani, R
    Savic, DA
    Walters, GA
    ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2005, 37 (02) : 167 - 183
  • [9] Evolutionary algorithms for multi-objective design optimization
    Sefrioui, M
    Whitney, E
    Periaux, J
    Srinivas, K
    COUPLING OF FLUIDS, STRUCTURES AND WAVES IN AERONAUTICS, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 85 : 224 - 237
  • [10] Multi-objective optimisation of cancer chemotherapy using evolutionary algorithms
    Petrovski, A
    McCall, J
    EVOLUTIONARY MULTI-CRITERION OPTIMIZATION, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 1993 : 531 - 545