Development of the Allocation System for Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation

被引:52
|
作者
Coombes, John M.
Trotter, James F.
机构
[1] Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, 80262, CO
关键词
Liver transplantation; Cadaver; Acute liver failure; Decision support techniques; Tissue and organ procurement/organization & administration; Organ transplantation; Registries;
D O I
10.3121/cmr.3.2.87
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
As the number of pre- and post-transplant solid organ recipients continues to grow, it becomes important for all physicians to have an understanding of the process of organ procurement and allocation. In the United States, the current system for allocation and transplantation of human solid organs has been heavily influenced by the experience in deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). This review highlights the significant changes that have occurred over the past 10 years in DDLT, with specific attention to the impact of the Model for Endstage Liver Disease (MELD) score on organ allocation and pre- and post-transplant survival DDLT is managed by the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) which oversees organ procurement and allocation across geographically defined Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs). For many years, deceased donor livers were allocated to waiting list patients based on subjective parameters of disease severity and accrued waiting time. In addition, organs have traditionally been retained within the OPO where they are procured contributing to geographic disparities in disease severity at the time of transplantation among deceased donor recipients In response to a perceived unfairness in organ allocation, Congress issued its "Final Rule" in 1998. The Rule called for a more objective ranking of waiting list patients and more parity in disease severity among transplant recipients across OPOs. To date, little progress has been made in eliminating geographic inequities. Patients in the smallest OPOs continue to receive liver transplants at a lower level of disease severity. However, strides have been made to standardize assessments of disease severity and better prioritize waiting list patients. The MELD score has emerged as an excellent predictor of short-term mortality in patients with advanced liver disease, and patients listed for liver transplantation are now ranked based on their respective MELD scores. This has improved organ access to the most severely ill patients without compromising waiting list mortality or post-transplant survival The current system for DDLT remains imperfect but has improved significantly in the past decade. As the number of patients in need of DDLT grows, the system will continue to evolve to meet this increasing demand
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 92
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Oncologic indications of liver transplantation and deceased donor liver allocation in the United States
    Kubal, Chandrashekhar
    Mihaylov, Plamen
    Holden, John
    CURRENT OPINION IN ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 26 (02) : 168 - 175
  • [2] Deceased donor liver transplantation
    Seehofer, D.
    Schoening, W.
    Neuhaus, P.
    CHIRURG, 2013, 84 (05): : 391 - 397
  • [3] Regional differences in deceased donor liver transplantation and their implications for organ utilization and allocation
    Hayashi, Paul H.
    Axelrod, David A.
    Galanko, Joseph
    Salvalaggio, Paolo R.
    Schnitzler, Mark
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 25 (01) : 156 - 163
  • [4] National Liver Allocation Policy-Consensus Document by the Liver Transplantation Society of India for a Nationally Uniform System of Allocation of Deceased Donor Liver Grafts
    Reddy, Mettu S.
    Mathur, Surendra K.
    Sudhindran, Surendran
    Gupta, Subhash
    Rela, Mohamed
    Soin, Arvinder S.
    Mirza, Darius
    Asthana, Sonal
    Chinthakindi, Madhusudhan
    Jacob, Mathew
    Kumaran, Vinay
    Modi, Pranjal
    Mohanka, Ravi
    Narasimhan, Gomathy
    Pal, Sujoy
    Pamecha, Viniyendra
    Rastogi, Amit
    Saigal, Sanjiv
    Wadhawan, Manav
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 13 (02) : 303 - 318
  • [5] Outcomes of Living Donor Liver Transplantation Compared with Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation
    Tulla, Kiara A.
    Tinney Jr, Francis J.
    Cameron, Andrew M.
    SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 104 (01) : 79 - 88
  • [6] Is living donor liver transplantation really equivalent to deceased donor liver transplantation?
    Ohdan, Hideki
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 26 (08) : 778 - 779
  • [7] Living donor liver transplantation versus deceased donor liver transplantation in children
    Hakeem, A. R.
    Prasad, R.
    Devlin, J.
    Rajwal, S.
    Gupte, G.
    Grammatikopoulos, T.
    Sharif, K.
    Vilca-Melendez, H.
    Dhawan, A.
    Attia, M.
    Mirza, D.
    Heaton, N.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 106 (8S) : 152 - 153
  • [8] Outcomes of Pediatric Liver Transplantation: Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation vs Living Donor Liver Transplantation
    Zhang, R.
    Zhu, Z. -J.
    Sun, L. -Y.
    Wei, L.
    Qu, W.
    Zeng, Z. -G.
    Liu, Y.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2018, 50 (10) : 3601 - 3605
  • [9] Low Volume Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation Alongside Living Donor Liver Transplantation
    Chan, See C.
    Lo, Chung M.
    Chan, Albert C.
    Tsang, Simon H.
    Cheung, Tan T.
    Sharr, William W.
    Chok, Kenneth S.
    Fan, Sheung T.
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 16 (06) : S145 - S146
  • [10] Use of living donor liver transplantation varies with the availability of deceased donor liver transplantation
    Vagefi, Parsia A.
    Ascher, Nancy L.
    Freise, Chris E.
    Dodge, Jennifer L.
    Roberts, John P.
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 18 (02) : 160 - 165