Anticipatory life-cycle assessment for responsible research and innovation

被引:100
作者
Wender, Ben A. [1 ,2 ]
Foley, Rider W. [2 ]
Hottle, Troy A. [1 ]
Sadowski, Jathan [3 ]
Prado-Lopez, Valentina [1 ]
Eisenberg, Daniel A. [1 ]
Laurin, Lise [4 ]
Seager, Thomas P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainable Engn & Built Environm, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Ctr Nanotechnol Soc, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, Consortium Sci Policy & Outcomes, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[4] Earthshift LLC, Kittery, ME 03904 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
anticipation; technology assessment; foresight; knowledge integration;
D O I
10.1080/23299460.2014.920121
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The goal of guiding innovation toward beneficial social and environmental outcomes - referred to in the growing literature as responsible research and innovation (RRI) - is intuitively worthwhile but lacks practicable tools for implementation. One potentially useful tool is life-cycle assessment (LCA), which is a comprehensive framework used to evaluate the environmental impacts of products, processes, and technologies. However, LCA ineffectively promotes RRI for at least two reasons: (1) Codified approaches to LCA are largely retrospective, relying heavily on data collected from mature industries with existing supply chains and (2) LCA underemphasizes the importance of stakeholder engagement to inform critical modeling decisions which diminishes the social credibility and relevance of results. LCA researchers have made piecemeal advances that address these shortcomings, yet there is no consensus regarding how to advance LCA to support RRI of emerging technologies. This paper advocates for development of anticipatory LCA as non-predictive and inclusive of uncertainty, which can be used to explore both reasonable and extreme-case scenarios of future environmental burdens associated with an emerging technology. By identifying the most relevant uncertainties and engaging research and development decision-makers, such anticipatory methods can generate alternative research agenda and provide a practicable tool to promote environmental RRI.
引用
收藏
页码:200 / 207
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Berube DM, 2013, EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES: SOCIO-BEHAVIORAL LIFE CYCLE APPROACHES, P139
[2]   Implementing life cycle assessment in product development [J].
Bhander, GS ;
Hauschild, M ;
McAloone, T .
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS, 2003, 22 (04) :255-267
[3]  
Canis Laure, 2010, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V45, P5068
[4]   Dynamic life cycle assessment: framework and application to an institutional building [J].
Collinge, William O. ;
Landis, Amy E. ;
Jones, Alex K. ;
Schaefer, Laura A. ;
Bilec, Melissa M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2013, 18 (03) :538-552
[5]  
Collingridge D., 1980, SOCIAL CONTROL TECHN
[6]   Modeling Future Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Environmental Impacts of Electricity Supplies in Brazil [J].
Dale, Alexander T. ;
Pereira de Lucena, Andre Frossard ;
Marriott, Joe ;
Moreira Cesar Borba, Bruno Soares ;
Schaeffer, Roberto ;
Bilec, Melissa M. .
ENERGIES, 2013, 6 (07) :3182-3208
[7]  
Davies J. C., 2009, OVERSIGHT NEXT GENER
[8]   New Perspectives on Nanomaterial Aquatic Ecotoxicity: Production Impacts Exceed Direct Exposure Impacts for Carbon Nanotoubes [J].
Eckelman, Matthew J. ;
Mauter, Meagan S. ;
Isaacs, Jacqueline A. ;
Elimelech, Menachem .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 46 (05) :2902-2910
[9]  
Fisher E., 2013, RESPONSIBLE INNOVATI, P165, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781118551424.CH9
[10]   Patterns of nanotechnology innovation and governance within a metropolitan area [J].
Foley, Rider W. ;
Wiek, Arnim .
TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2013, 35 (04) :233-247