A Comparison of Canadian and Australian Sport for Development (SFD) Policy Directives for Indigenous Peoples

In this study, we employ Bacchi's (2012) "What's the Problem Represented to be?" approach to guide our discourse analysis of federal Indigenous sport for development (SFD) policies in Canada and Australia. Through a review of government policies and reports, we highlight the often-divergent policy directives set out by federal departments in these two countries. Specifically, interdepartmental partnerships in areas such as health, education, and justice fail to be adequately facilitated through SFD policies in Canada, while, conversely, Australia has strived toward greater federal partnership-building. Within the identified Canadian and Australian policies, both countries have consistently presented sport as having the potential to contribute to Indigenous peoples' social and economic development, as well as to reconciliation, thus highlighting the growing institutional support behind Indigenous SFD. This policy analysis research provides a novel contribution to the growing overall body of literature investigating the politics of partnership-building in SFD initiatives.