SKIN SAMPLING - VALIDATION OF A PAD METHOD AND COMPARISON WITH COMMONLY USED METHODS

被引:34
|
作者
HAMBRAEUS, A [1 ]
HOBORN, J [1 ]
WHYTE, W [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV GLASGOW,BLDG SERV RES UNIT,GLASGOW G12 8QQ,SCOTLAND
关键词
Skin sampling; validation of methods;
D O I
10.1016/0195-6701(90)90045-P
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Two types of pad were tested for sampling bacteria from the skin. One pad was made of 85% viscose and a 15% mixture of polyester and polyamide fibres, the other was made of polyvinyl-alcohol foam. The efficiency was calculated using double samples and 8 consecutive samples. The two pads were equally efficient and more efficient when moist. Their efficiency was compared with that of the bud swab, the Rodac plate and the scrub cylinder method. Using the double sample method for calculation, the scrub cylinder method and the pads were equally efficient, around 50%. As calculated from consecutive samples the efficiency of the pads was about 45%, the efficiency of the cylinder scrub method 29%, and that of the bud swab and Rodac plate 16% and 5% respectively. The low efficiency of the Rodac plate may be partly explained by the fact that microcolonies and not bacterial cells are sampled with this method. © 1990.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 27
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison among several commonly used sampling methods for a degradation test
    Hu, Cheng-Hung
    Lee, Ming-Yung
    QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 34 (03) : 436 - 458
  • [2] Comparison of a novel methadone rotation method with other commonly used methods
    Cunningham, Elaine
    Dibiagio, Nicole
    O' Connell, Florry
    Flannery, Maedhbh
    Cronin, Michael
    Murphy, Marie
    O'Leary, Mary Jane
    Kiely, Fiona
    Lowney, Aoife C.
    BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2024,
  • [4] Improving the UNC Passive Aerosol Sampler Model Based on Comparison with Commonly Used Aerosol Sampling Methods
    Shirdel, Mariam
    Andersson, Britt M.
    Bergdahl, Ingvar A.
    Sommar, Johan N.
    Wingfors, Hakan
    Liljelind, Ingrid E.
    ANNALS OF WORK EXPOSURES AND HEALTH, 2018, 62 (03) : 328 - 338
  • [5] Comparison of statistical methods commonly used in predictive modelling
    Muñoz, J
    Felicísimo, AM
    JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE, 2004, 15 (02) : 285 - 292
  • [6] A comparison of two commonly used methods of weight estimation
    Argall, JAW
    Wright, N
    Mackway-Jones, K
    Jackson, R
    ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2003, 88 (09) : 789 - 790
  • [7] PLOIDY DETERMINATION - A COMPARISON OF 4 COMMONLY USED METHODS
    PULLMAN, J
    WILBURN, S
    BUR, M
    REALE, F
    WODA, B
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 1990, 62 (01) : A81 - A81
  • [8] LOAD ESTIMATION METHOD USING DISTRIBUTIONS WITH COVARIATES: A COMPARISON WITH COMMONLY USED ESTIMATION METHODS
    Raymond, Sebastien
    Mailhot, Alain
    Talbot, Guillaume
    Gagnon, Patrick
    Rousseau, Alain N.
    Moatar, Florentina
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2014, 50 (03): : 791 - 804
  • [9] CRITICAL COMPARISON OF COLLECTION EFFICIENCIES OF COMMONLY USED AEROSOL SAMPLING DEVICES
    SCHADT, C
    CADLE, RD
    ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1957, 29 (06) : 864 - 868
  • [10] A COMPARISON OF THREE COMMONLY USED METHODS FOR TREATING NO PREFERENCE VOTES
    Ennis, John M.
    Ennis, Daniel M.
    JOURNAL OF SENSORY STUDIES, 2012, 27 (02) : 123 - 129