PREDICTION OF THE SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE INFANT - WHICH ULTRASONIC MEASUREMENT IS BEST

被引:0
|
作者
CHANG, TC
ROBSON, SC
BOYS, RJ
SPENCER, JAD
机构
[1] UNIV COLL HOSP LONDON,DEPT OBSTET & GYNECOL,86-96 CHENIES MEWS,LONDON WC1E 6HX,ENGLAND
[2] UNIV NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE,DEPT MATH & STAT,NEWCASTLE TYNE NE1 7RU,TYNE & WEAR,ENGLAND
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 1992年 / 80卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the most appropriate ultrasonic measurement for the prediction of a small for gestational age (SGA) infant. Data sources: A literature search of all English language journals over the last 15 years was undertaken. One hundred seventeen articles on the use of morphometric and Doppler ultrasonic measurements in the diagnosis of SGA were reviewed. Methods of study selection: Studies were included if antenatal and postnatal criteria for diagnosis were clearly defined and data for SGA and normal fetuses were reported, allowing the construction of a 2 x 2 table. Data extraction and synthesis: Studies with the same criteria were grouped according to whether the population was high or low risk. The sensitivity, odds ratio (OR), and false-positive rate were calculated for each study; summary statistics were then calculated for each ultrasonic measurement provided the individual sensitivities, ORs, and false-positive rates were not significantly different (P > .01). Conclusions: In high-risk subjects, abdominal circumference below the tenth percentile had the highest common sensitivity, and estimated fetal weight below the tenth percentile had the highest common OR. In studies in which morphometric and Doppler ultrasonic measurements were compared in the same subjects, the Doppler ORs tended to be lower than the ORs for morphometric measurements. In low-risk subjects, much lower ORs were found for all ultrasonic measurements The heterogeneous nature of the studies reviewed may have contributed to the different results within each group.
引用
收藏
页码:1030 / 1038
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] METABOLISM OF SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE INFANT
    STAVE, U
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1974, 291 (07): : 359 - 360
  • [2] ULTRASONIC RECOGNITION OF THE SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE FETUS
    BROWN, HL
    MILLER, JM
    GABERT, HA
    KISSLING, G
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1987, 69 (04): : 631 - 635
  • [3] ZELLWEGER SYNDROME IN A PRETERM, SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE INFANT
    SAMSOM, JF
    JAKOBS, C
    VANDEKLEIVANMOORSEL, J
    SMIT, LME
    SCHUTGENS, RBH
    WANDERS, RJA
    JOURNAL OF INHERITED METABOLIC DISEASE, 1992, 15 (01) : 75 - 83
  • [4] INCREASED GLUCONEOGENIC SUBSTRATES IN SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE INFANT
    HAYMOND, MW
    KARL, IE
    PAGLIARA, AS
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1974, 291 (07): : 322 - 328
  • [5] THE SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE INFANT - OBSTETRICAL MANAGEMENT AND PERINATAL OUTCOME
    CNATTINGIUS, S
    UPSALA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 1989, 94 (01) : 55 - 65
  • [6] How best to diagnose and treat the small-for-gestational-age fetus
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 209 (05) : 397 - 399
  • [7] Feature selection and prediction of small-for-gestational-age infants
    Li J.
    Liu L.
    Zhou M.
    Yang J.-J.
    Chen S.
    Liu H.
    Wang Q.
    Pan H.
    Sun Z.
    Tan F.
    Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 2024, 15 (03) : 1881 - 1895
  • [8] Small-for-gestational-age infants and antenatal prediction of outcome
    Roth, S
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 8 (03) : 149 - 151
  • [9] Adjustment of birth weight standards for maternal and infant characteristics improves the prediction of outcome in the small-for-gestational-age infant
    Sciscione, AC
    Gorman, R
    Callan, NA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (03) : 544 - 547
  • [10] Neurodevelopmental outcomes of the premature, small-for-gestational-age infant through age 6
    Wallace, IF
    McCarton, CM
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 40 (04): : 843 - 852