共 12 条
- [2] THE INVESTMENT BANKERS CASE: THE USE OF SEMANTICS TO AVOID THE PER SE ILLEGALITY OF PRICE FIXING YALE LAW JOURNAL, 1954, 63 (03): : 399 - 407
- [3] A CRITIQUE OF UNITED-STATES EXPERIENCE WITH PRICE-FIXING AGREEMENTS AND THE PER SE RULE JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 1959, 8 (01): : 13 - 32
- [6] THE RULE OF REASON AND THE PER SE CONCEPT - PRICE FIXING AND MARKET DIVISION YALE LAW JOURNAL, 1965, 74 (05): : 775 - 847
- [8] Standard-setting organizations: Patents, price fixing, and per se legality UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW, 2003, 70 (03): : 983 - 1009
- [9] RULE OF REASON AND PER-SE CONCEPT - PRICE FIXING AND MARKET DIVISION .2. YALE LAW JOURNAL, 1966, 75 (03): : 373 - 475
- [10] ANTITRUST ANALYSIS - SHOULD MAXIMUM PRICE SETTING BY HEALTH-CARE PROVIDERS BE SUBJECT TO A PER SE RULE OF ILLEGALITY UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT LAW REVIEW, 1985, 63 (1-2): : 305 - 321