POLICIES TO ENCOURAGE INFLOWS OF TECHNOLOGY THROUGH FOREIGN MULTINATIONALS

被引:51
作者
KOKKO, A
BLOMSTROM, M
机构
[1] NATL BUR ECON RES,NEW YORK,NY 10003
[2] CTR ECON POLICY RES,LONDON SW1Y 6LA,ENGLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0305-750X(94)00131-H
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Do host countries aiming to maximize the inflows of technology through foreign multinationals have any policy alternatives to formal technology transfer requirements and performance requirements? To answer this question, the present paper examines some possible determinants of the technology imports of US majority-owned foreign affiliates in 33 host countries. The results show that the affiliates technology imports increase with the host countries' domestic investment levels and education levels. but that various performance requirements are negatively related to technology transfer. This suggests that policies promoting local investment, competition, and education may sometimes be alternatives or complements to formal technology transfer regulations.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 468
页数:10
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, FOREIGN INVESTMENT S
[2]   SYMPOSIUM ON THE STATE AND ECONOMIC-DEVELOPMENT [J].
BARDHAN, P .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1990, 4 (03) :3-7
[3]  
Bhagwati JN., 1988, PROTECTIONISM
[4]   HOST COUNTRY COMPETITION, LABOR SKILLS, AND TECHNOLOGY-TRANSFER BY MULTIDIMENSIONALS [J].
BLOMSTROM, M ;
KOKKO, A ;
ZEJAN, M .
WELTWIRTSCHAFTLICHES ARCHIV-REVIEW OF WORLD ECONOMICS, 1994, 130 (03) :521-533
[5]   MULTINATIONAL FIRMS, COMPETITION, AND PRODUCTIVITY IN HOST-COUNTRY MARKETS [J].
CAVES, RE .
ECONOMICA, 1974, 41 (162) :176-193
[6]   FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT AND SPILLOVER EFFICIENCY BENEFITS IN CANADIAN MANUFACTURING-INDUSTRIES [J].
GLOBERMAN, S .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 1979, 12 (01) :42-56
[7]  
GRAHAM EM, 1991, NATURE TRANSNATIONAL, P155
[8]  
Grosse Robert, 1989, MULTINATIONALS LATIN
[9]  
Heston A, 1988, REV INCOME WEALTH, V34, P1
[10]  
KAKKO A, 1994, J DEV ECON, V43, P279