YIELD AND QUALITY OF SOYBEAN FORAGE AS AFFECTED BY CULTIVAR AND MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES

被引:59
|
作者
HINTZ, RW [1 ]
ALBRECHT, KA [1 ]
OPLINGER, ES [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV WISCONSIN,DEPT AGRON,MADISON,WI 53706
关键词
D O I
10.2134/agronj1992.00021962008400050007x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Soybean [Glycine mar (L.) Merr.] has potential for use as an alternative forage crop, however, little is known about the effects of cultural practices on forage yield and quality. A study was conducted to evaluate the effects of cultivar, row spacing, plant density, and harvest maturity on the yield and quality of soybean forage. The study was conducted at the Univ. of Wisconsin Arlington Agricultural Research Station, Arlington, WI on a Plano silt-loam soil (fine-silty, mixed, mesic, Typic Argiudoll) in 1987 and 1989. The cultivars Corsoy 79, Pella, and Williams 82 were grown at 20- and 76-cm row spacings at planting rates of 280 000 and 890 000 seeds ha-1 and were harvested al the R1, R3, R5, and R7 stages of development. Harvest maturity had the greatest effect on soybean forage yield and quality of the management practices evaluated. The yield of soybean forage increased from 2.4 Mg ha-1 when harvested at R1 to 7.4 Mg ha-1 when harvested at R7, but quality declined between stages R1 and R5 then increased from R5 to R7 as pods developed and seeds filled. Late maturing cultivars (Maturity Group III vs. Maturity Group II) produced greater forage yields but lower quality forage when harvested at the same stage of development. The 20-cm row spacing produced 1.2 Mg ha-1 more forage than the 76-cm row spacing, but crude protein concentration was 8 g kg-1 less. The results of this experiment indicate that soybean can produce forage similar in quality to alfalfa and that management practices typically used for grain production are suitable for forage production.
引用
收藏
页码:795 / 798
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] INFLUENCE OF MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES ON FORAGE YIELD AND QUALITY OF SUDANGRASS
    SINGH, T
    RAI, SD
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 1975, 45 (08): : 372 - 376
  • [2] FORAGE AND GRAIN YIELDS OF WHEAT AND TRITICALE AS AFFECTED BY FORAGE MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES
    MILLER, GL
    JOOST, RE
    HARRISON, SA
    CROP SCIENCE, 1993, 33 (05) : 1070 - 1075
  • [3] GROWTH, YIELD, AND QUALITY OF FORAGE MAIZE UNDER DIFFERENT NITROGEN MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES
    COX, WJ
    KALONGE, S
    CHERNEY, DJR
    REID, WS
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1993, 85 (02) : 341 - 347
  • [4] EFFECT OF MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES ON REGROWTH, BIOLOGICAL YIELD AND QUALITY OF OAT GROWN FOR FORAGE
    DEO, GD
    RAI, SD
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 1975, 45 (09): : 397 - 402
  • [5] INTENSIVE CROP MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES ON WHEAT YIELD AND QUALITY
    MOHAMED, MA
    STEINER, JJ
    WRIGHT, SD
    BHANGOO, MS
    MILLHOUSE, DE
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1990, 82 (04) : 701 - 707
  • [6] Yield and quality of forage soybean
    Sheaffer, CC
    Orf, JH
    Devine, TE
    Jewett, JG
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2001, 93 (01) : 99 - 106
  • [7] Yield, quality and weed control in soybean crop as affected by several cultural and weed management practices
    Kanatas, Panagiotis
    Travlos, Ilias
    Papastylianou, Panayiota
    Gazoulis, Ioannis
    Kakabouki, Ioanna
    Tsekoura, Anastasia
    NOTULAE BOTANICAE HORTI AGROBOTANICI CLUJ-NAPOCA, 2020, 48 (01) : 329 - 341
  • [8] GRAIN-YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF SOFT RED WINTER-WHEAT AS AFFECTED BY MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES
    FREDERICK, JR
    MARSHALL, HG
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1985, 77 (03) : 495 - 499
  • [9] NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS TRANSFORMATIONS AS AFFECTED BY CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON CROP YIELD
    BERI, V
    SIDHU, BS
    BAHL, GS
    BHAT, AK
    SOIL USE AND MANAGEMENT, 1995, 11 (02) : 51 - 54
  • [10] GROWTH AND YIELD OF RABBITEYE BLUEBERRY AS AFFECTED BY ORCHARD FLOOR MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES AND IRRIGATION GEOMETRY
    PATTEN, KD
    NEUENDORFF, EW
    NIMR, GH
    PETERS, SC
    CAWTHON, DL
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1989, 114 (05) : 728 - 732