Aecomix (TM) for efficient energy recovery from wastewater and waste streams

被引:2
|
作者
Menkveld, H. W. H. [1 ]
Broeders, E. [1 ]
Smith, G. O. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Nijhuis Water Technol, POB 44, NL-7000 AA Doetinchem, Netherlands
来源
WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY | 2018年 / 13卷 / 02期
关键词
biogas production; COD reduction; dissolved biogas flotation; high rate anaerobic treatment; TSS; wastewater;
D O I
10.2166/wpt.2018.031
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Food and beverage production plants are major wastewater contributors and often have food waste. Particularly plants with wastewaters with a significant total suspended solids and/or fats, oils and greases like in the dairy, redmeat and chicken industry needs to pre-treat their wastewater before high rate anaerobic reactors can be applied. This pre-treatment generally includes undesirable chemical treatment and generates a concentrated side stream which needs to be dealt with. The Aecomix (TM) reactor is an anaerobic reactor with solids retention, particularly suited to treat such effluents, together with available organic wastes. In this manner two waste streams are dealt with in one system and a high level of conversion to biogas is achieved. The solids retention is achieved by Dissolved Biogas Flotation. A full scale Aecomix (TM) reactor treated the effluent of a chocolate/candy factory with a COD concentration varying between 10,000-60,000 mg/l at an average of 37,000 mg/l. The removal for COD and TSS was more than 95% on average. To meet with local discharge regulations a post aerobic biological treatment may be required. The excess sludge from this aerobic system can be returned to the Aecomix (TM) reactor, which is another advantage over high rate (UASB or EGSB type) reactors. The Aecomix (TM) is approximately 50% lower in yearly costs compared to a chemical treatment plant based on flocculation flotation followed by an EGSB reactor.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 266
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Valuable Metals and Energy Recovery from Electronic Waste Streams
    Tesfaye, Fiseha
    Lindberg, Daniel
    Hamuyuni, Joseph
    ENERGY TECHNOLOGY 2017: CARBON DIOXIDE MANAGEMENT AND OTHER TECHNOLOGIES, 2017, : 103 - 116
  • [2] Study on properties related to energy recovery from waste streams in Finland
    Sermyagina, E.
    Nikku, M.
    Vakkilainen, E.
    Hyppanen, T.
    WASTES - SOLUTIONS, TREATMENTS AND OPPORTUNITIES II, 2018, : 69 - 74
  • [3] RECOVERY OF CHEMICALS FROM WASTE STREAMS
    KHANDELWAL, PK
    RESEARCH AND INDUSTRY, 1993, 38 (03): : 176 - 180
  • [4] EFFICIENT AND ECONOMICAL ENERGY RECOVERY FROM WASTE BY COFIRING WITH COAL
    MCGOWIN, CR
    HUGHES, EE
    ACS SYMPOSIUM SERIES, 1993, 515 : 14 - 26
  • [5] Recovery of precious metals from waste streams
    He, Jing
    Kappler, Andreas
    MICROBIAL BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2017, 10 (05): : 1194 - 1198
  • [6] Efficient phosphate recovery from agro waste streams by enzyme, strain, and process engineering
    Ruff, Anna Joelle
    Hamer, Stephanie
    Foerster, Jan
    Blank, Lars M.
    Schwaneberg, Ulrich
    YEAST, 2015, 32 : S167 - S167
  • [7] Phosphorus Recovery and Reuse from Waste Streams
    Karunanithi, Rajasekar
    Szogi, Ariel A.
    Bolan, Nanthi
    Naidu, Ravi
    Loganathan, Paripurnanda
    Hunt, Patrick G.
    Vanotti, Matias B.
    Saint, Christopher P.
    Ok, Yong Sik
    Krishnamoorthy, Sathiya
    ADVANCES IN AGRONOMY, VOL 131, 2015, 131 : 173 - 250
  • [8] Maximizing resource recovery from waste streams
    Grant, T
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS, 2003, 22 (04): : 250 - 254
  • [9] Carbon recovery from screenings for energy-efficient wastewater treatment
    Kaless, M.
    Palmowski, L.
    Pinnekamp, J.
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 76 (12) : 3299 - 3306
  • [10] High recovery, energy efficient wastewater desalination
    Li, Feng
    Fang, Chenyi
    Liu, Wei
    Yang, Liming
    Guo, Bingyi
    Zhang, Sui
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2021, 631