共 50 条
Smoking Cessation in Recovery: Comparing 2 Different Cognitive Behavioral Treatments
被引:12
|作者:
Hunt, Yvonne M.
[1
,3
,4
]
Rash, Carla J.
[2
,3
,4
]
Burke, Randy S.
[3
,4
,5
]
Parker, Jefferson D.
[3
,4
]
机构:
[1] NCI, Canc Prevent Fellowship Program, Ctr Canc Training, Tobacco Control Res Branch,Behav Res Program,Div, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Univ Connecticut, Hlth Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Farmington, CT USA
[3] Univ Mississippi, Med Ctr, GV Sonny Montgomery VA Med Ctr, University, MS 38677 USA
[4] Univ Mississippi, Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat & Human Behav, University, MS 38677 USA
[5] SC MIRECC, Jackson, MS USA
来源:
关键词:
contingency management;
smoking cessation;
substance-abuse treatment;
veterans;
D O I:
10.1097/ADT.0b013e3181bf0310
中图分类号:
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Objectives: The purpose of this pilot demonstration study was to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of adding a contingency management (CM) component to the standard cognitive-behavioral smoking cessation treatment offered to veterans in a residential substanceabuse treatment program. Specifically, we assessed the impact of CM on (1) engagement in smoking cessation treatment, (2) retention in smoking cessation treatment, and (3) abstinence from smoking. Methods: Participants were 65 male veterans in inpatient treatment for a primary substance use disorder who expressed interest in quitting smoking. Participants were enrolled in either the standard or CM smoking cessation treatment program. All participants were offered 4 sessions of cognitive-behavioral group counseling; participants in the CM program also had the opportunity to earn cash vouchers for session attendance and abstinence from smoking. Results: The CM treatment program showed superior treatment engagement and retention rates. Survival analysis showed that 58% of participants receiving the CM treatment were smoke-free on quit day, versus only 17% of participants in standard care. In addition, the end of treatment continuous abstinence rate was significantly higher in the CM condition compared with standard care (21% vs. 0%). Conclusions: These preliminary results suggest that contingency management approaches may be useful for maximizing participation in smoking cessation treatment and improving treatment outcomes among recovering substance users.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 74
页数:11
相关论文