SYMPTOMATOLOGY AND CULTIVAR REACTION OF CHRYSANTHEMUM TO FUSARIUM WILT

被引:0
|
作者
ENGELHARD, AW [1 ]
WOLTZ, SS [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV FLORIDA, BRADENTON, FL USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:1435 / 1435
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] FUSARIUM-WILT OF CHRYSANTHEMUM - CULTIVAR SUSCEPTIBILITY AND CHEMICAL CONTROL
    STRIDER, DL
    PLANT DISEASE, 1985, 69 (07) : 564 - 568
  • [2] Fusarium Wilt of Imperial Chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium) Caused by Fusarium oxysporum in China
    Chen, Xinyu
    Shu, Yongxin
    Luo, Mei
    Xiang, Meimei
    Huang, Yinghua
    Zhang, Weili
    Dong, Zhangyong
    PLANT DISEASE, 2020, 104 (03) : 985 - 985
  • [3] A Study of Soil-Borne Fusarium Wilt in Continuous Cropping Chrysanthemum Cultivar 'Guangyu' in Henan, China
    Liu, Lei
    Jin, Yaqiong
    Chen, Miaomiao
    Lian, Huijuan
    Liu, Yanyan
    Yin, Qianxi
    Wang, Hailei
    JOURNAL OF FUNGI, 2024, 10 (01)
  • [4] PATHOGENESIS AND DISSEMINATION OF FUSARIUM WILT PATHOGENS OF CHRYSANTHEMUM
    ENGELHARD, AW
    WOLTZ, SS
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1973, 63 (04) : 441 - 441
  • [5] A FUNGICIDE SCREEN FOR FUSARIUM-WILT OF CHRYSANTHEMUM
    ENGELHARD, AW
    WOLTZ, SS
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1987, 77 (12) : 1749 - 1749
  • [6] BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL CONTROL OF FUSARIUM-WILT OF CHRYSANTHEMUM
    RAJU, BC
    SEMER, CR
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1984, 74 (07) : 822 - 822
  • [7] WILT OF CHRYSANTHEMUM CAUSED BY RACE 1 OF COWPEA FUSARIUM
    SRMSTRON.GM
    ARMSTRONG, JK
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1964, 54 (08) : 886 - &
  • [8] EVALUATING ALFALFA FOR REACTION TO FUSARIUM WILT AND FUSARIUM WILT-BACTERIAL WILT COMBINED
    FROSHEISER, FI
    BARNES, DK
    AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE PUBLICATION, 1976, (NNC-5): : 43 - 43
  • [9] NUFAR: A sweet basil cultivar resistant to fusarium wilt
    Reuveni, R
    Dudai, N
    Putievski, E
    HORTSCIENCE, 1998, 33 (01) : 159 - 159
  • [10] SYMPTOMATOLOGY OF TOMATO SPOTTED WILT VIRUS-INFECTION IN FLORISTS CHRYSANTHEMUM
    MATTEONI, JA
    ALLEN, WR
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PHYTOPATHOLOGIE, 1989, 11 (04): : 373 - 380