FORAGE VALUE OF NATIVE AND INTRODUCED BROWSE SPECIES IN TANZANIA

被引:5
|
作者
MSANGI, RBR
HARDESTY, LH
机构
来源
JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT | 1993年 / 46卷 / 05期
关键词
MIOMBO; SILVOPASTORAL; LEUCAENA; ANTIDESMA; MARGARITARIA; PHYLLANTHUS;
D O I
10.2307/4002658
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The nutritional value of Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit was compared with that of 3 browse species native to western Tanzania: Antidesma venosum Mey. & Tul., Margaritaria discoides Baill., and Phyllanthus reticulatus Lodd. Foliage samples were collected monthly throughout the dry season from replicated sites on 3 different soil types and analyzed for crude protein, total ash, and in vitro dry matter digestibility. The crude protein content of L. leucocephala (17.60-29.69%) was higher (P<.05) than that of the native species (8.51-16.33%) throughout the study. Phyllanthus reticulatus had the highest crude protein of the native species. Abscised leaves had only half the crude protein of green leaves of the same species. All species showed a significant increase in crude protein when new leaves appeared. L. leucocephala had as much or more ash (6.96-9.77%) than the native species. Margaritaria discoides was more (P<.05) digestible (56.75-74.06%) than all other species on all dates but one. The in vitro dry matter digestibility of green and abscised leaves of the same species did not differ (P<.05) until July when green leaves of M. discoides, were more digestible. Soil type affected the in vitro dry matter digestibility of all species except A. venosum (P<.05), but did not affect crude protein values. Both the native species and L. leucocephala can contribute significantly to meeting animal nutrient demands in the dry season.
引用
收藏
页码:410 / 415
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] NUTRITIVE VALUE OF NATIVE ANDEAN FORAGE SPECIES
    JOHNSON, WL
    PEZO, D
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1971, 33 (01) : 213 - &
  • [2] OBSERVATIONS ON THE ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION VALUE OF NATIVE AND INTRODUCED TREE SPECIES
    ROSE, CI
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 1979, 73 (04): : 219 - 229
  • [3] Proximal analysis and performance of five native species with forage value
    Oliva, Manuel
    Benjamin Melendez-Mori, Jegnes
    Luis Maicelo-Quintana, Jorge
    Emilio Milla-Pino, Manuel
    Leiva, Santos
    REVISTA DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ZULIA, 2022, 13 (36): : 114 - 125
  • [4] FORAGE QUALITY OF PROSTRATE KOCHIA COMPARED WITH 3 BROWSE SPECIES
    DAVIS, AM
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1979, 71 (05) : 822 - 824
  • [5] NATIVE FORAGE SHRUB SPECIES IN SOUTH-EASTERN SPAIN - FORAGE SPECIES, FORAGE PHYTOMASS, NUTRITIVE-VALUE AND CARRYING-CAPACITY
    ROBLES, AB
    PASSERA, CB
    JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS, 1995, 30 (02) : 191 - 196
  • [6] CONSERVATION VALUE OF NATIVE AND INTRODUCED TREES
    ROSE, C
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 1981, 75 (01): : 59 - 60
  • [7] Nutritive value of some common browse species
    Turner, KE
    Foster, JG
    AMERICAN FORAGE AND GRASSLAND COUNCIL, VOL 9, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, 9 : 241 - 245
  • [8] Nutritive value of some common browse species
    Turner, KE
    Foster, JG
    AMERICAN FORAGE AND GRASSLAND COUNCIL, VOL 9, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, 9 : 49 - 49
  • [9] SOWN PASTURES OF NATIVE AND INTRODUCED SPECIES
    SCATTINI, WJ
    TROPICAL GRASSLANDS, 1981, 15 (01): : 62 - 62
  • [10] Yield and nutritive value of herbaceous and browse forage legumes in the Borgou region of Benin
    Adjolohoun, S.
    Buldgen, A.
    Adandedjan, C.
    Decruyenaere, V.
    Dardenne, P.
    TROPICAL GRASSLANDS, 2008, 42 (02): : 104 - 111