Neutrality, fairness or freedom? Principles for platform regulation

被引:8
作者
Bostoen, Friso [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Inst Consumer Competit & Market, Leuven, Belgium
关键词
Platforms; Regulation; Fairness; Neutrality; Transparency; Non-discrimination;
D O I
10.14763/2018.1.785
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
The need for online platform regulation has been a topic of scholarly debate. However, reality is now catching up to and even overtaking the academic writing on this subject. France has adopted a law on platform fairness, the European Commission recently ordered Google to implement a form of search neutrality, and more regulatory initiatives are on the horizon. That is why we have to look beyond the question whether online platforms should be regulated. As actual regulation supplants the scholarly debate, we must also examine how they are being regulated. This article distils from the various proposals at EU and member state level a set of operational principles that can serve as a frame of reference for productive debate on platform regulation.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 19
页数:19
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Ammori M., 2016, INTERNET COMPETITION, P52
[2]  
Angwin J., 2016, PROPUBLICA
[3]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, NUM LIB NOUV AG DEM
[5]  
Bostoen F, 2018, J ANTITRUST ENFORCEM, V6
[6]  
Bostoen F, 2017, JURA FALCONIS, V53, P3
[7]  
Bostoen F, 2017, EUROPEAN COMPETITION, V1, P223
[8]  
BusinessEurope, 2016, BUSINESSEUROPE RESP
[9]  
Centre on Regulation in Europe, 2017, PROJECT REPORT
[10]  
Conseil d'Etat, 2014, NUM DROITS FOND