Prediction of County-Level Corn Yields Using an Energy-Crop Growth Index

被引:0
|
作者
Andresen, Jeffrey A. [2 ]
Dale, Robert F. [1 ]
Fletcher, Jerald J. [3 ]
Preckel, Paul V. [3 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Agron, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] USDA, Joint Agr Weather Facil, World Agr Outlook Board, Washington, DC 20250 USA
[3] Purdue Univ, Dept Agr Econ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1175/1520-0442(1989)002<0048:POCLCY>2.0.CO;2
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Weather conditions significantly affect corn yields. While weather remains as the major uncontrolled variable in crop production, an understanding of the influence of weather on yields can aid in early and accurate assessment of the impact of weather and climate on crop yields and allow for timely agricultural extension advisories to help reduce farm management costs and improve marketing decisions. Based on data for four representative counties in Indiana from 1960 to 1984 (excluding 1970 because of the disastrous southern corn leaf blight), a model was developed to estimate corn (Zea mays L.) yields as a function of several composite soil-crop-weather variables and a technology-trend marker, applied nitrogen fertilizer (N). The model was tested by predicting corn yields for 15 other counties. A daily energy-crop growth (ECG) variable in which different weights were used for the three crop-weather variables which make up the daily ECG-solar radiation intercepted by the canopy, a temperature function, and the ratio of actual to potential evapotranspiration-performed better than when the ECG components were weighted equally. The summation of the weighted daily ECG over a relatively short period (36 days spanning silk) was found to provide the best index for predicting county average corn yield. Numerical estimation results indicate that the ratio of actual to potential evapotranspiration (ET/PET) is much more important than the other two ECG factors in estimating county average corn yield in Indiana.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 56
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] County-level corn yield prediction using supervised machine learning
    Khan, Shahid Nawaz
    Khan, Abid Nawaz
    Tariq, Aqil
    Lu, Linlin
    Malik, Naeem Abbas
    Umair, Muhammad
    Hatamleh, Wesam Atef
    Zawaideh, Farah Hanna
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 56 (01)
  • [2] AN ENERGY-CROP GROWTH VARIABLE AND TEMPERATURE FUNCTION FOR PREDICTING CORN GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT - PLANTING TO SILKING
    COELHO, DT
    DALE, RF
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1980, 72 (03) : 503 - 510
  • [3] US county-level agricultural crop production typology
    Wagner, Courtney R. Hammond
    Niles, Meredith T.
    Roy, Eric D.
    BMC RESEARCH NOTES, 2019, 12 (01)
  • [4] US county-level agricultural crop production typology
    Courtney R. Hammond Wagner
    Meredith T. Niles
    Eric D. Roy
    BMC Research Notes, 12
  • [5] Simulating county-level crop yields in the Conterminous United States using the Community Land Model: The effects of optimizing irrigation and fertilization
    Leng, Guoyong
    Zhang, Xuesong
    Huang, Maoyi
    Yang, Qichun
    Rafique, Rashid
    Asrar, Ghassem R.
    Leung, L. Ruby
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2016, 8 (04) : 1912 - 1931
  • [6] Exploiting the Relationship between Farm-Level Yields and County-Level Yields for Applied Analysis
    Gerlt, Scott
    Thompson, Wyatt
    Miller, Douglas J.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2014, 39 (02) : 253 - 270
  • [7] Recent changes in county-level corn yield variability in the United States from observations and crop models
    Leng, Guoyong
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 607 : 683 - 690
  • [8] Robust correlates of county-level growth in the United States
    Higgins, Matthew J.
    Young, Andrew T.
    Levy, Daniel
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2010, 17 (03) : 293 - 296
  • [9] Establishment Size by Sector and County-Level Economic Growth
    Sherrill Shaffer
    Small Business Economics, 2006, 26 : 145 - 154
  • [10] Establishment size by sector and county-level economic growth
    Shaffer, S
    SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2006, 26 (02) : 145 - 154