Application of response surface methodology to design optimization in formulation of a typical controlled release system

被引:0
|
作者
Fassihi, R
Fabian, J
Sakr, AM
机构
[1] UNIV WITWATERSRAND,DEPT PHARM,JOHANNESBURG,SOUTH AFRICA
[2] UNIV CINCINNATI,COLL PHARM,CINCINNATI,OH 45267
来源
PHARMAZEUTISCHE INDUSTRIE | 1995年 / 57卷 / 12期
关键词
tablet design optimization; controlled release formulation; response surface application; matrix type formulation; talc; magnesium stearate;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Through the application of factorial design in an experimental formulation, the role of talc and magnesium stearate as dissolution retardants in matrix type controlled release formulation containing a highly water soluble drug such as dexchlorpheniramine maleate Mas investigated It was found that talc (1-6%, W/W) on its own did not significantly affect matrix hardness or release profiles. Magnesium stearate (1-8%, W/W) exerted a significant exponential decrease on drug release rates and had a weakening effect on tablet hardness. This latter effect was easily counteracted by inclusion of low levels of talc in formulation. The response surface plot of interrelationship between dissolution time (T-50) amounts of magnesium stearate, and talc showed that the retardation in release profile extends in a non-linear fashion over the entire magnesium stearate concentration range. Results also indicate that regardless of the formulation composition there is always a significant interaction effect between talc and magnesium stearate in stabilization of a coherent matrix.
引用
收藏
页码:1039 / 1043
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Formulation and optimization of controlled release mucoadhesive tablets of atenolol using response surface methodology
    Bhupinder Singh
    Sukhwinder Kaur Chakkal
    Naveen Ahuja
    AAPS PharmSciTech, 7
  • [2] Formulation and optimization of controlled release mucoadhesive tablets of atenolol using response surface methodology
    Singh, B
    Chakkal, SK
    Ahuja, N
    AAPS PHARMSCITECH, 2006, 7 (01)
  • [3] Design and Optimization of Diclofenac Sodium Controlled Release Solid Dispersions by Response Surface Methodology
    Shivakumar, H. N.
    Desai, B. G.
    Deshmukh, G.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2008, 70 (01) : 22 - 30
  • [4] Formulation and Characterizations of Delayed Release Multi-Particulates System of Indomethacin: Optimization by Response Surface Methodology
    Nandy, Bankim Chandra
    Mazumder, Bhaskar
    CURRENT DRUG DELIVERY, 2014, 11 (01) : 72 - 86
  • [5] Formulation design and optimization of orodispersible tablets of etoricoxib by response surface methodology
    Shahi, S. R.
    Agrawal, G. R.
    Shinde, N. V.
    Shaikh, S. A.
    Shaikh, S. S.
    Padalkar, A. N.
    Somani, V. G.
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 2009, 3 (02) : 104 - 112
  • [6] DESIGN, FORMULATION AND OPTIMIZATION OF RUTIN TRIHYDRATE EMULGEL BY RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY
    Kusuma, M. P.
    Sushmitha, C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH, 2020, 11 (11): : 5799 - 5804
  • [7] Response surface methodology for optimization of losartan potassium controlled release tablets
    Chopra, S.
    Patil, G. V.
    Motwani, S. K.
    JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE, 2006, 116 (02) : E102 - E104
  • [8] Formulation and Optimization of Sustained Release Tablets of Venlafaxine Resinates Using Response Surface Methodology
    Madgulkar, Ashwini R.
    Bhalekar, M. R.
    Kolhe, V. J.
    Kenjale, Y. D.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 71 (04) : 387 - 394
  • [9] Formulation and optimization of sustained release terbutaline sulfate microspheres using response surface methodology
    Khattab, Ibrahim
    Bandarkar, Farzana
    Lila, Ahmed
    DRUG DISCOVERIES AND THERAPEUTICS, 2009, 3 (03): : 123 - 135
  • [10] Formulation and optimization of sustained release tablets of isoxuprine hydrochloride using response surface methodology
    Patel, R. B.
    Patel, M.
    Bharadia, P. D.
    Patel, J. K.
    Patel, M. M.
    Patel, K.
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 58 : A10 - A11