Improving SME logistics performance through benchmarking

被引:17
|
作者
Taschner, Andreas [1 ]
机构
[1] Reutlingen Univ, ESB Business Sch, Reutlingen, Germany
关键词
Performance management; Germany; Benchmarking; Logistics; Small-to-medium-sized enterprises; Supply chain management;
D O I
10.1108/BIJ-03-2015-0029
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to discuss the applicability of current benchmarking proposals for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and to suggest a condensed process for logistics benchmarking in SMEs. Design/methodology/approach - The paper starts by outlining why the logistics function is of increasing importance for SMEs. It discusses the benefit of logistics benchmarking and typical SME restrictions in benchmarking. Available approaches to benchmarking are discussed and their weaknesses when applied to SME logistics benchmarking are analyzed. The paper develops a new benchmarking process framework for SME logistics benchmarking and reports findings of a case application in three German SMEs. Findings - The paper suggests a conceptual framework for logistics benchmarking in SMEs. The framework was tested in three German case companies. Results suggest that the suggested process together with the employed benchmarking tools and templates provide valuable support for SMEs in a logistics benchmarking project. Research limitations/implications - The conceptual framework developed has been tested in selected case companies only. Possible adaptations to specific industry needs or cultural differences need to be integrated. Practical implications - The process framework developed provides practical guidance for SMEs that want to embark on a logistics benchmarking exercise. Originality/value - The paper outlines weaknesses of current SME benchmarking approaches and provides practical support by outlining an adapted process together with specific implementation tools.
引用
收藏
页码:1780 / 1797
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Improving system performance through benchmarking
    Watson, JJ
    ASHRAE JOURNAL, 2005, 47 (03) : 56 - +
  • [2] Improving organisational performance through reverse logistics
    Mihi Ramirez, Antonio
    Garcia Morales, Victor Jesus
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2014, 65 (06) : 954 - 962
  • [3] Improving Reliability Performance and Global Benchmarking through PEER
    Sulthan, Ishaq
    Keerthana, M. S.
    2019 INNOVATIONS IN POWER AND ADVANCED COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES (I-PACT), 2019,
  • [4] Improving performance of logistics SMEs through knowledge management
    Kianto, Aino
    Nisula, Anna-Maija
    Inkinen, Henri
    Vanhala, Mika
    IFKAD 2017: 12TH INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON KNOWLEDGE ASSET DYNAMICS: KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT IN THE 21ST CENTURY: RESILIENCE, CREATIVITY AND CO-CREATION, 2017, : 1639 - 1648
  • [5] Improving environmental performance through reverse logistics at IBM®
    Grenchus, E
    Johnson, S
    McDonnell, D
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2001 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTRONICS AND THE ENVIRONMENT, CONFERENCE RECORD, 2001, : 236 - 240
  • [6] Improving the business performance of an SME in the UK through strategic quality management
    Tennant, C
    Tanner, S
    Roberts, P
    ADVANCES IN MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY - XVII, 2003, : 493 - 497
  • [7] Improving financial and environmental performance through MFCA: A SME case study
    Sahu, Aditya Kumar
    Padhy, R. K.
    Das, Debabrata
    Gautam, Amitosh
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 279
  • [8] Benchmarking green logistics performance with a composite index
    Lau, Kwok Hung
    BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2011, 18 (06) : 873 - +
  • [9] An empirical assessment of the operational performance through internal benchmarking: a case of a global logistics firm
    Bhattacharya, Arijit
    David, Dhyan Albert
    PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2018, 29 (07) : 614 - 631
  • [10] Improving Distribution Service Performance Through Effective Production and Logistics Integration
    Springinklee, Martin
    Wallenburg, Carl Marcus
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS LOGISTICS, 2012, 33 (04) : 309 - 323