Plain Language Makes a Difference When People Vote

被引:0
|
作者
Redish, Janice [1 ]
Chisnell, Dana E. [2 ]
Laskowski, Sharon J. [3 ]
Lowry, Svetlana [3 ]
机构
[1] Redish & Associates Inc, 6820 Winterberry Lane, Bethesda, MD 20817 USA
[2] UsabilityWorks, N Andover, MA 01845 USA
[3] Natl Inst Stand & Technol, Visualizat & Usabil Grp, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
关键词
ballots; empirical study; instructions; plain language; usability; voting;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The authors report on a study in which 45 U.S. citizens in three geographic areas and over a range of ages and education levels voted on two ballots that differed only in the wording and presentation of the language on the ballots. The study sought to answer three questions: Do voters vote more accurately on a ballot with plain language instructions than on a ballot with traditional instructions? Do voters recognize the difference in language between the two ballots? Do voters prefer one ballot over the other? In addition to voting on the two ballots, study participants commented on pages from the two ballots and indicated their preference page-by-page and overall. For this study, the answer to all three questions was "yes." Participants performed better with the plain language ballot. Their comments showed that they recognized plain language. They overwhelmingly preferred the plain language ballot. The authors also discuss issues that arose on both ballots from problems with straight-party voting, with mistaking one contest for another, and with reviewing votes. Based on the study results, the authors provide guidance on language to use on ballots. This article includes links to the two ballots, other materials used in the study, and the full report with more details.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 103
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条