The immediate effects of thoracic transverse mobilization in patients with the primary complaint of mechanical neck pain: a pilot study

被引:3
|
作者
McGregor, Cindy [1 ]
Boyles, Robert [1 ]
Murahashi, Laura [2 ]
Sena, Tanya [3 ]
Yarnall, Robert [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Puget Sound, Phys Therapy, Tacoma, WA 98416 USA
[2] MOSAIC Rehabil, Bellevue, WA USA
[3] Alaska Native Med Ctr, Anchorage, AK USA
[4] Belltown Phys Therapy, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
Transverse vertebral pressure; Thoracic mobilization; Neck pain;
D O I
10.1179/2042618614Y.0000000073
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: Posterior-to-anterior (PA) vertebral mobilization to the thoracic spine has been studied as an intervention for neck pain. Our purpose was to explore effects of a different mobilization technique, transverse vertebral pressure, on cervical range of motion (ROM) and pain when applied to the thoracic spine among participants with neck pain. Methods: A single-blinded quasi-experimental study with a one-group pretest-posttest design. A transverse group consisted of 21 participants whose neck pain increased with active movements. A non-intervention group of 20 asymptomatic participants was included simply to ensure rater blinding. The treatment group received Grades IV to IV+ transverse mobilizations at T1 through T4 bilaterally. Measurements taken immediately after intervention included pre/post cervical ROM, distant pressure pain threshold (PPT), and a numerical pain rating scale (NPRS). Analysis utilized t-tests and ordinal counterparts. Results: The transverse group demonstrated significant gains in extension and bilateral rotation (P <= 0.005) but not flexion or side-bend. A total of 57% of mobilized participants reported clinically meaningful decreased pain (P<0.001). Seven participants exceeded the PPT MDC95 of 0.36 kg/cm(2). The nonintervention group had no significant changes in ROM or NPRS scores. Discussion: After 8 minutes of transverse mobilization to the upper thoracic spine, significant gains in cervical extension and bilateral rotation, and decreased pain scores were found. There were no adverse effects. Unlike other mobilization studies, PPT changes at a remote site were statistically but not clinically meaningful. Findings suggest that transverse mobilization would be a productive topic for controlled clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 198
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Immediate effects of thoracic spine self-mobilization in patients with mechanical neck pain: A randomized controlled trial
    Nakamaru, Koji
    Aizawa, Junya
    Kawarada, Keizo
    Uemura, Yukari
    Koyama, Takayuki
    Nitta, Osamu
    JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES, 2019, 23 (02) : 417 - 424
  • [2] Immediate effects of the central posteroanterior mobilization technique on pain and range of motion in patients with mechanical neck pain
    Kanlayanaphotporn, Rotsalai
    Chiradejnant, Adit
    Vachalathiti, Roongtiwa
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2010, 32 (08) : 622 - 628
  • [3] Immediate effects of cervicothoracic junction mobilization versus thoracic manipulation on the range of motion and pain in mechanical neck pain with cervicothoracic junction dysfunction: a pilot randomized controlled trial
    Shriya Joshi
    Ganesh Balthillaya
    Y. V. Raghava Neelapala
    Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, 28
  • [4] Immediate effects of cervicothoracic junction mobilization versus thoracic manipulation on the range of motion and pain in mechanical neck pain with cervicothoracic junction dysfunction: a pilot randomized controlled trial
    Joshi, Shriya
    Balthillaya, Ganesh
    Neelapala, Y. V. Raghava
    CHIROPRACTIC & MANUAL THERAPIES, 2020, 28 (01)
  • [5] The Effects of Thoracic Manipulation Versus Mobilization for Chronic Neck Pain: a Randomized Controlled Trial Pilot Study
    Suvarnnato, Thavatchai
    Puntumetakul, Rungthip
    Kaber, David
    Boucaut, Rose
    Boonphakob, Yodchai
    Arayawichanon, Preeda
    Chatchawan, Uraiwan
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY SCIENCE, 2013, 25 (07) : 865 - 871
  • [6] Thoracic manipulation versus mobilization in patients with mechanical neck pain: a systematic review
    Young, Jodi L.
    Walker, Doug
    Snyder, Shane
    Daly, Kelly
    JOURNAL OF MANUAL & MANIPULATIVE THERAPY, 2014, 22 (03) : 141 - 153
  • [7] CERVICAL AND THORACIC MOBILIZATION VERSUS MANIPULATION FOR MECHANICAL NECK PAIN
    Earnshaw, Darren
    Kabbaz, Vincent J.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2012, 42 (04): : 382 - 383
  • [8] The Effects of Cervical Mobilization Combined with Thoracic Mobilization on Forward Head Posture of Neck Pain Patients
    Lee, Jaehong
    Lee, Younghwa
    Kim, Hansoo
    Lee, Jongho
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY SCIENCE, 2013, 25 (01) : 7 - 9
  • [9] Effects of thoracic spine mobilization on chest expansion in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial
    Hafez, Hanaa Ali
    Mohamed, Mohamed Ahmed
    Elarian, Ahmed Ibrahim
    Nasreldien, Mennaallahy
    Hossam, Asmaa
    Abbas, Osama Yassin
    Abd Allah, Dina S.
    PEDAGOGY OF PHYSICAL CULTURE AND SPORTS, 2024, 28 (04):
  • [10] Immediate effects of thoracic manipulation in patients with neck pain: a randomized clinical trial
    Cleland, JA
    Childs, MJD
    McRae, M
    Palmer, JA
    Stowell, T
    MANUAL THERAPY, 2005, 10 (02) : 127 - 135