Assessment of Earth Gravity Field Models in the Medium to High Frequency Spectrum Based on GRACE and GOCE Dynamic Orbit Analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Papanikolaou, Thomas D. [1 ,2 ]
Tsoulis, Dimitrios [3 ]
机构
[1] Geosci Australia, Cnr Jerrabomberra Ave & Hindmarsh Dr, Symonston, ACT 2609, Australia
[2] Cooperat Res Ctr Spatial Informat, Docklands, Vic 3008, Australia
[3] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Geodesy & Surveying, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
关键词
dynamic orbit determination; gravity field models; satellite gravity missions; inter-satellite ranging;
D O I
10.3390/geosciences8120441
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
An analysis of current static and time-variable gravity field models is presented focusing on the medium to high frequencies of the geopotential as expressed by the spherical harmonic coefficients. A validation scheme of the gravity field models is implemented based on dynamic orbit determination that is applied in a degree-wise cumulative sense of the individual spherical harmonics. The approach is applied to real data of the Gravity Field and Steady-State Ocean Circulation (GOCE) and Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite missions, as well as to GRACE inter-satellite K-band ranging (KBR) data. Since the proposed scheme aims at capturing gravitational discrepancies, we consider a few deterministic empirical parameters in order to avoid absorbing part of the gravity signal that may be included in the monitored orbit residuals. The present contribution aims at a band-limited analysis for identifying characteristic degree ranges and thresholds of the various GRACE- and GOCE-based gravity field models. The degree range 100-180 is investigated based on the degree-wise cumulative approach. The identified degree thresholds have values of 130 and 160 based on the GRACE KBR data and the GOCE orbit analysis, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Assessment of chosen GRACE-related gravity models based on the GOCE satellite precise science orbit
    Andrzej Bobojć
    Acta Geophysica, 2019, 67 : 1265 - 1275
  • [2] Assessment of chosen GRACE-related gravity models based on the GOCE satellite precise science orbit
    Bobojc, Andrzej
    ACTA GEOPHYSICA, 2019, 67 (04) : 1265 - 1275
  • [3] Dynamic orbit parameterization and assessment in the frame of current GOCE gravity models
    Papanikolaou, Thomas D.
    Tsoulis, Dimitrios
    PHYSICS OF THE EARTH AND PLANETARY INTERIORS, 2014, 236 : 1 - 9
  • [4] Signal and error assessment of GOCE-based high resolution gravity field models
    Gruber, T.
    Willberg, M.
    JOURNAL OF GEODETIC SCIENCE, 2019, 9 (01) : 71 - 86
  • [5] Analyzing spectral characteristics of the global Earth gravity field models obtained from the CHAMP, GRACE and GOCE space missions
    Karpik A.P.
    Kanushin V.F.
    Ganagina I.G.
    Goldobin D.N.
    Mazurova E.M.
    Gyroscopy and Navigation, 2015, 6 (2) : 101 - 108
  • [6] Aliasing effect of high-frequency mass variations on GOCE recovery of the earth's gravity field
    Han, SC
    Shum, CK
    Ditmar, P
    Visser, P
    van Beelen, C
    Schrama, EJO
    JOURNAL OF GEODYNAMICS, 2006, 41 (1-3) : 69 - 76
  • [7] High-frequency analysis of Earth gravity field models based on terrestrial gravity and GPS/levelling data: a case study in Greece
    Papanikolaou, T. D.
    Papadopoulos, N.
    JOURNAL OF GEODETIC SCIENCE, 2015, 5 (01) : 67 - 79
  • [8] ERS-2 orbit computations using CHAMP- or GRACE-based gravity field models
    Visser, PNAM
    SATELLITE DYNAMICS IN THE ERA OF INTERDISCIPLINARY SPACE GEODESY, 2005, 36 (03): : 454 - 459
  • [9] Improved multichannel singular spectrum analysis for post-processing GRACE monthly gravity field models
    Wang, Fengwei
    Shen, Yunzhong
    Chen, Tianyi
    Chen, Qiujie
    Li, Weiwei
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 223 (02) : 825 - 839
  • [10] Using Models of the Deep Structure of the Earth's Crust and Upper Mantle Based on GOCE Gravity Data in Metallogenic Analysis
    Volkov, A. V.
    Galyamov, A. L.
    Savchuk, Yu. S.
    IZVESTIYA ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC PHYSICS, 2020, 56 (12) : 1528 - 1536