GENOTOXICITY TESTING STRATEGIES

被引:4
|
作者
ELLIOTT, BM
机构
[1] Zeneca Central Toxicology Laboratory, Macclesfield, Cheshire SK10 4TJ, Alderley Park
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0887-2333(94)90090-6
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
Genotoxicity tests contribute to the assessment of whether a chemical has the potential to cause somatic or germ-cell effects in animals (i.e. the potential to induce cancer or heritable mutation). Such genotoxicity testing is usually undertaken in a stepwise approach; first an assessment in vitro, to determine intrinsic genotoxic activity, and secondly, an evaluation in vivo to determine whether any such activity is expressed in the whole animal. While this core principle is now generally accepted, there are still different opinions as to when, and how many, in vitro or in vivo assays should be conducted. Such strategies would be simplified and harmonized if testing was carried out based on the knowledge that there was a precedent for that strategy being required to detect a carcinogen or mutagen rather than the possibility that it might.
引用
收藏
页码:871 / 872
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Strategies in genotoxicity testing
    Vondracek, Jan
    FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2017, 106 : 573 - 573
  • [2] New strategies in genotoxicity testing
    Kirkland, David
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2007, 172 : S24 - S24
  • [3] Strategies in industrial genotoxicity testing of drugs
    van Acker, Frederique
    Joosten, Harrie
    van den Dobbelsteen, Diels
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2007, 172 : S18 - S18
  • [4] STRATEGIES AND PHILOSOPHIES OF GENOTOXICITY TESTING - WHAT IS THE QUESTION
    ZEIGER, E
    MUTATION RESEARCH, 1994, 304 (02): : 309 - 314
  • [5] Strategies in case of positive in vivo results in genotoxicity testing
    Thybaud, Veronique
    MacGregor, James T.
    Mueller, Lutz
    Crebelli, Riccardo
    Dearfield, Kerry
    Douglas, George
    Farmer, Peter B.
    Gocke, Elmar
    Hayashi, Makoto
    Lovell, David P.
    Lutz, Werner K.
    Marzin, Daniel
    Moore, Martha
    Nohmi, Takehiko
    Phillips, David H.
    Van Benthem, Jan
    MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 2011, 723 (02) : 121 - 128
  • [6] In vivo genotoxicity testing strategies: Report from the 7th International workshop on genotoxicity testing (IWGT)
    Kirkland, David
    Uno, Yoshifumi
    Luijten, Mirjam
    Beevers, Carol
    van Benthem, Jan
    Burlinson, Brian
    Dertinger, Stephen
    Douglas, George R.
    Hamada, Shuichi
    Horibata, Katsuyoshi
    Lovell, David P.
    Manjanatha, Mugimane
    Martus, Hans-Joerg
    Mei, Nan
    Morita, Takeshi
    Ohyama, Wakako
    Williams, Andrew
    MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 2019, 847
  • [7] In vivo genotoxicity testing strategies: Report from the 8th International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT)
    Beevers, Carol
    Uno, Yoshifumi
    Meurer, Krista
    Hamada, Shuichi
    Hashimoto, Kiyohiro
    Kirkland, David
    Lebaron, Matthew J.
    Le Curieux, Frank
    Le Hegarat, Ludovic
    Martus, Hans-Joerg
    Masumura, Kenichi
    Ohyama, Wakako
    Roberts, Daniel J.
    Vasquez, Marie
    Whitwell, James
    Witt, Kristine L.
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS, 2023,
  • [8] In vitro and integrated in vivo strategies to reduce animal use in genotoxicity testing
    Groff, Katherine
    Evans, Stephen J.
    Doak, Shareen H.
    Pfuhler, Stefan
    Corvi, Raffaella
    Saunders, Samantha
    Stoddart, Gilly
    MUTAGENESIS, 2021, 36 (06) : 389 - 400
  • [9] Immunotoxicity, genotoxicity and epigenetic toxicity of nanomaterials: New strategies for toxicity testing?
    Dusinska, Maria
    Tulinska, Jana
    El Yamani, Naouale
    Kuricova, Miroslava
    Liskova, Aurelia
    Rollerova, Eva
    Runden-Pran, Elise
    Smolkova, Bozena
    FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2017, 109 : 797 - 811
  • [10] GENOTOXICITY TESTING - CURRENT PRACTICES AND STRATEGIES USED BY THE PHARMACEUTICAL-INDUSTRY
    PURVES, D
    HARVEY, C
    TWEATS, D
    LUMLEY, CE
    MUTAGENESIS, 1995, 10 (04) : 297 - 305