Evaluation of Menarini SediMAX analyzer for automated urine microscopy analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Rossi, Cristina [1 ]
Porzio, Silvio [1 ]
Chiarpotto, Michela [1 ]
De Sole, Pasquale [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cattol Sacro Cuore, Ist Biochim Biochim Clin, Rome, Italy
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate the analytical performance of SediMAX. (Menarini Diagnostics), a new analytical tool for automatic analysis of urinary sediment. On 422 routine samples, we correlated the microscopic examination with SediMAX morphological outputs. In an early experimental phase, the manufacturer's ranges were adopted obtaining unsatisfactory results. To improve the degree of correlation, we modified the reference ranges. An overall concordance rate of 87.4% for red blood cells, 81% for leucocytes, 74.2% for bacteria, and 84.1% for squamous epithelial cells was finally obtained. The rate of false positive results ranged from 2.1% (red cells) to 17.3% (bacteria), and the rate of false negative results ranged from 3.7% (leucocytes) to 9.6% (bacteria). In conclusion, our results seem to suggest that the performance of SediMAX instrument should be improved before to recommend its use for replacement of urine microscopy examination.
引用
收藏
页码:545 / 549
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Correlation of Sedimax® (Menarini) versus reverse light microscopy for examination of urine sediment
    Devos, Helena
    Mermans, Ingrid
    Goossens, Herman
    Even, Margareta
    ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 2009, 64 (02): : 180 - 180
  • [2] Evaluation of a new automated microscopy urine sediment analyser - sediMAX conTRUST®
    Bogaert, Laura
    Peeters, Bart
    Billen, Jaak
    ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 2017, 72 (02) : 91 - 94
  • [3] From manual to automated urine analysis: Evaluation of manual microscopy, UF-100 and sediMAX
    Claerhout, H.
    Gils, S.
    Pauwels, S.
    Billen, J.
    ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 2014, 69 : 18 - 18
  • [4] Evaluation of the iQ™200 automated urine microscopy analyzer
    Lee, G
    Lee, K
    Yoon, S
    Lee, C
    Kim, Y
    Lee, K
    Cho, Y
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2005, 51 : A216 - A216
  • [5] Distinction between urine crystals by automated urine analyzer SediMAX conTRUST is specific but lacks sensitivity
    Castiglione, Vincent
    Cavalier, Etienne
    Diop, Coumba
    Gadisseur, Romy
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2017, 55 (12) : E288 - E290
  • [6] Evaluation of iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer
    Park, Joowon
    Kim, Jongwan
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2008, 28 (04): : 267 - 273
  • [7] Comparison and evaluation of urine particle analysis methods:: the iQ®200 Automated Urine Microscopy Analyzer vs. manual microscopy
    Vogiatzakis, E
    Kouvardas, S
    Gkogka, A
    Skalidaki, E
    Alevra, A
    Mastrokalou, E
    Antonopoulou, R
    Kostogianni, G
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2005, 51 : A215 - A216
  • [8] Evaluation of the iQ® 200 automated urine microscopy analyzer in a clinical laboratory
    Haliassos, A
    Mandalaki, E
    Bizioura, L
    Antonopolou, R
    Chiotinis, N
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2005, 355 : S375 - S375
  • [9] Urine sediment analysis: Analytical and diagnostic performance of sediMAX® - A new automated microscopy image-based urine sediment analyser
    Zaman, Zahur
    Fogazzi, Giovanni Battista
    Garigali, Giuseppe
    Croci, Maria Daniela
    Bayer, Gabor
    Kranicz, Tunde
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2010, 411 (3-4) : 147 - 154
  • [10] Improvement in the detection of enteric protozoa from clinical stool samples using the automated urine sediment analyzer sediMAX® 2 compared to sediMAX® 1
    J. Intra
    M. R. Sala
    R. Falbo
    F. Cappellini
    P. Brambilla
    European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2017, 36 : 147 - 151