Chickering's Seven Principles of Good Practice: Student Attrition in Community College Online Courses

被引:23
|
作者
Tirrell, Tim [1 ]
Quick, Don [1 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/10668920903054907
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
As online enrollments escalate, so does concern about student attrition rates. There is an abundance of literature addressing student success in online courses, particularly using constructivist learning theories to create engaging learning experiences. Also emerging from the literature is the Seven principles of good instructional practice by Checkering and Gamson as an accepted rubric for evaluating effective online instruction. This study focused on whether the use of instructional strategies as measured by the seven principles had an effect on student attrition rates in online courses. Full and part-time faculty at three community colleges in Virginia who taught online course(s) in the last three semesters completed an online survey to determine the extent to which they used instructional strategies reflecting the constructivist-based seven principles in their online courses. Scores from the survey were then compared to the attrition rates in their courses. Results indicated both groups strongly used instructional strategies reflecting the seven principles of good practice in their online courses with full-time faculty scores ranging a bit higher. When the results for the principles were examined individually rather than as a set, both groups scored lower on principles reflecting innovative instructional strategies. No relation between the extent to which faculty reported using those instructional strategies and student success as measured by attrition rates were found. However, a moderate relation was found with the third principle, "encourage active learning.'' This indicated that faculty who made strides toward actively engaging students found some success in reducing student attrition.
引用
收藏
页码:580 / 590
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Using the seven principles of good practice to evaluate online courses
    Graham, CR
    Cagiltay, K
    Craner, J
    Lim, BR
    Duffy, T
    16TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON DISTANCE TEACHING & LEARNING, 2000, : 187 - 193
  • [2] Using the Seven Principles of Good Practice to evaluate online courses
    Graham, CR
    Cagiltay, K
    Craner, J
    Lim, BR
    Duffy, T
    16TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON DISTANCE TEACHING AND LEARNING, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 187 - 193
  • [3] Seven principles for good practice in midterm student feedback
    Taylor, Rebecca L.
    Knorr, Kris
    Ogrodnik, Michelle
    Sinclair, Peter
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 25 (04) : 350 - 362
  • [4] Student Characteristics That Predict Persistence in Community College Online Courses
    Harrell, Ivan, II
    Bower, Beverly
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISTANCE EDUCATION, 2011, 25 (03) : 178 - 191
  • [5] Assessing the Reliability of Merging Chickering & Gamson's Seven Principles for Good Practice with Merrill's Different Levels of Instructional Strategy (DLISt7)
    Jabar, Syaril Izwann
    Albion, Peter R.
    ONLINE LEARNING, 2016, 20 (02): : 51 - 74
  • [6] Incorporating Blogs and the Seven Principles of Good Practice into Preservice ICT Courses: a Case Study
    Goktas, Yuksel
    NEW EDUCATIONAL REVIEW, 2009, 19 (3-4): : 29 - 44
  • [7] Seven principles - For good practice in teaching
    不详
    QUEST, 2007, : 12 - 12
  • [8] Applying the Seven Principles of Good Practice: Technology as a Lever - in an Online Research Course
    Johnson, Sherryl
    JOURNAL OF INTERACTIVE ONLINE LEARNING, 2014, 13 (02): : 41 - 50
  • [9] Student learning community of practice: Making meaning of the student learning imperative and principles of good practice in student affairs
    Smith, SF
    Rodgers, RF
    JOURNAL OF COLLEGE STUDENT DEVELOPMENT, 2005, 46 (05) : 472 - 486
  • [10] COMMUNITY COLLEGE STUDENT SUCCESS COURSES: THE STUDENT PERSPECTIVE
    Duggan, Molly H.
    Williams, Mitchell R.
    COMMUNITY COLLEGE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2010, 35 (1-2) : 121 - 134