CLEANING EXCAVATED SOIL USING EXTRACTION AGENTS - A STATE-OF-THE-ART REVIEW

被引:17
|
作者
RAGHAVAN, R
COLES, E
DIETZ, D
机构
[1] Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Livingston, New Jersey
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0304-3894(91)85006-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In response to the RCRA Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 prohibiting the continued land disposal of untreated hazardous wastes, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has instituted a research and development program for new technologies to treat RCRA and Superfund wastes. As part of this research program, technologies applicable to cleaning excavated soils were reviewed. This report reviews the state-of-the-art of soil cleaning technologies and their applicability to Superfund sites in the United States. The review includes Superfund site soil and contamination characteristics; as well as soil washing technologies, their principles of operation, and process parameters. The technical feasibility of using soil washing technologies at Superfund sites in the United States is assessed. Contaminants are classified as volatile, hydrophilic, or hydrophobic organics; PCBs; heavy metals; or radioactive material. Soils are classified as either sand, silt, clay, or waste fill. Three generic types of extractive treatments are identified for cleaning excavated soils: water washing augmented with a basic or surfactant agent to remove organics, and water washing with an acidic or chelating agent to remove organics and heavy metals; organics-solvent washing to remove hydrophobic organics and PCBs; and air or steam stripping to remove volatile organics. Although extraction of organics and toxic metal contaminants from excavated sandy/silty soil that is low in clay and humus content has been successfully demonstrated at several pilot-plant test facilities, extraction from clay and humus soil fractions is more complicated and requires additional pilot-scale testing before application at Superfund sites.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 87
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PREDISPERSED SOLVENT EXTRACTION──THE STATE-OF-THE-ART REVIEW
    Wang Yundong Huang Yingyi and Dai Youyuan State Key Laboratory of Chemical EngineeringSolvent Extraction Laboratory Department of Chemica Engineering Tsinghua University Beijing
    化工学报, 2000, (S1) : 299 - 302
  • [2] Hormonally active agents in the environment: a state-of-the-art review
    Anwer, Faizan
    Chaurasia, Savita
    Khan, Abid Ali
    REVIEWS ON ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2016, 31 (04) : 415 - 433
  • [3] STATE-OF-THE-ART SOIL
    Cernansky, Rachel
    NATURE, 2015, 517 (7534) : 258 - 260
  • [4] Road Lane Landmark Extraction: A State-of-the-art Review
    Izquierdo, Asier
    Manuel Lopez-Guede, Jose
    Grana, Manuel
    HYBRID ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, HAIS 2019, 2019, 11734 : 625 - 635
  • [5] State-of-the-Art Review on the Role of Geocells in Soil Reinforcement
    Sheikh, Ishfaq Rashid
    Shah, M. Y.
    GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 39 (03) : 1727 - 1741
  • [6] State-of-the-Art Review on the Role of Geocells in Soil Reinforcement
    Ishfaq Rashid Sheikh
    M. Y. Shah
    Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2021, 39 : 1727 - 1741
  • [7] State-of-the-art review of research on the particle shape of soil
    Ma Cheng-hao
    Zhu Chang-qi
    Liu Hai-feng
    Cui Xiang
    Wang Tian-min
    Jiang Kai-fang
    Yi Ming-xing
    ROCK AND SOIL MECHANICS, 2021, 42 (08) : 2041 - 2058
  • [8] A state-of-the-art review of polymers used in soil stabilization
    Huang, Jianxin
    Kogbara, Reginald B.
    Hariharan, Narain
    Masad, Eyad A.
    Little, Dallas N.
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2021, 305
  • [9] Chitin and chitosan as antitumour agents : A state-of-the-art mini review
    Jain, Tanvi
    Dutta, P. K.
    JOURNAL OF THE INDIAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 93 (07) : 751 - 757
  • [10] State-of-the-art review
    Langhoff-Roos, Jens
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2016, 95 (09) : 963 - 964