A COMPARISON OF WORKING POSTURES OF PARCEL SORTERS USING 3 DIFFERENT WORKING METHODS

被引:4
|
作者
DERKSEN, JCM
VANRIEL, MPJM
VANWINGERDEN, JP
SNIJDERS, CJ
机构
[1] Department of Biomedical Physics and Technology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, 3000 DR
关键词
WORKING POSTURE ANALYSIS; MOVEMENT REGISTRATION; BACK; WORKING METHOD; PARCEL SORTING;
D O I
10.1080/00140139408963647
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The postures of the trunk of eight parcel sorters were measured continuously under three different working conditions, during whore shifts. The working methods used were two different sorting tables and a hydraulic lifting platform on which the carts were to be placed. The question posed by the PTT-Post occupational health service was whether the latter method proved to be the better one with respect to the load on the musculoskeletal system. This study will help them to make a well-considered decision on which working method to choose for the new distribution centre in Rotterdam. The method used for measuring the working postures and movements of the trunk is the Portable Posture Registration Set (PPRS). This method was developed at the department of Biomedical Physics and Technology of the Erasmus University Rotterdam. While using the lifting platform, the subjects stood 8-11% more erect compared to the work at the sorting tables, thereby reducing the load on the lumbar spine. For this reason the lifting platform is preferred, although sagittal flexion of the back was somewhat more. It is stressed that the way in which sorters use the lifting platform is very important.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 309
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SHOULDER MUSCLE LOAD IN DIFFERENT WORKING POSTURES
    HERBERTS, P
    ALMSTROM, C
    HOGFORS, C
    KADEFORS, R
    PALMERUD, G
    SIGHOLM, G
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1983, 54 (04): : 671 - 671
  • [2] Working postures and postural load: Methods with special focus on working environment in agriculture
    Pinzke, S
    SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTERS IN AGRICULTURE, 1996, : 1075 - 1086
  • [3] A comparison of occupational groups using different working postures in terms of their low back and neck health status
    Cetin, Hatice
    Bilgin, Sevil
    Kose, Nezire
    JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 2018, 31 (03) : 475 - 480
  • [4] Investigating the Effects of Different Working Postures on Cognitive Performance
    Mohammadi, Sharareh
    Mokhtarinia, Hamid Reza
    Jafarpisheh, Amir Salar
    Kasaeian, Amir
    Osqueizadeh, Reza
    ARCHIVES OF REHABILITATION, 2018, 18 (04): : 268 - 277
  • [5] QUANTITATIVE STUDIES OF LOAD ON BACK IN DIFFERENT WORKING-POSTURES
    ANDERSSON, G
    ORTENGREN, R
    NACHEMSON, A
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 1978, : 173 - 181
  • [6] Ergonomic risk assessment of working postures of nurses working in a medical faculty hospital with REBA and RULA methods
    Ayvaz, Ozkan
    Ozyildirim, Bedia Ayhan
    Issever, Halim
    Oztan, Gozde
    Atak, Muhammed
    Ozel, Sevda
    SCIENCE PROGRESS, 2023, 106 (04)
  • [7] Ergonomic assessment of working postures in clothing sector with scientific observation methods
    Isler, Meral
    Kucuk, Mehmet
    Guner, Mucella
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLOTHING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 30 (06) : 757 - 771
  • [8] Work-wear pattern design to accommodate different working postures
    Braganca, Sara
    Carvalho, Miguel
    Arezes, Pedro
    Ashdown, Susan P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLOTHING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 29 (03) : 294 - 313
  • [9] Stabilisation times after transitions to standing from different working postures
    DiDomenico, Angela
    McGorry, Raymond W.
    Banks, Jacob J.
    ERGONOMICS, 2016, 59 (10) : 1288 - 1293
  • [10] Analysis of Working Postures at a Construction Site Using the OWAS Method
    Lee, Tzu-Hsien
    Han, Chia-Shan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND ERGONOMICS, 2013, 19 (02) : 245 - 250