Post-Crisis Experiments in Development Finance Architectures: A Hirschmanian Perspective On 'Productive Incoherence'

The Asian and especially the global crisis of 2008 have catalyzed decentralization of the developing world's financial governance architecture. I understand this state of affairs via the concept of "productive incoherence" which is apparent in a denser, multilayered development financial architecture that is emerging as a consequence of heterogeneous practical adjustments to changing circumstances rather than as the embodiment of a coherent doctrine. Drawing on Albert Hirschman, I argue that the absence of an encompassing theoretical blueprint for a new economic system-i.e. a new "ism" to replace neoliberalism-is in fact a vitally important virtue. If we cannot live without a new "ism," I propose "Hirschmanian Possibilism" as a new doctrine-one that rejects an overarching theoretical framework from which to deduce the singly appropriate institutional structure of the economy. Hirschmanian Possibilism asserts instead the value of productive incoherence as a framework for pursuing democratic, ethically viable development institutions.