Optimal sensor placement methodology for parametric identification of structural systems

被引:341
|
作者
Papadimitriou, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Thessaly, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, Pedion Areos 38334, Volos, Greece
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jsv.2003.10.063
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Theoretical and computational issues arising in the selection of the optimal sensor configuration for parameter estimation in structural dynamics are addressed. The information entropy, measuring the uncertainty in the system parameters, is used as the performance measure of a sensor configuration. A useful asymptotic approximation for the information entropy, valid for a large number of measured data, is derived. The asymptotic estimate is then used to rigorously justify that selections of the optimal sensor configuration can be based solely on a nominal structural model, ignoring the time history details of the measured data which are not available in the experimental design stage. It is further shown that the lower and upper bounds of the information entropy are decreasing functions of the number of sensors. Based on this result, two algorithms are proposed for constructing effective sensor configurations that are superior, in terms of computational efficiency and accuracy, to the sensor configurations provided by genetic algorithms. The theoretical developments and the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms are illustrated by designing the optimal configuration for a 10-degree-of-freedom (d.o.f.) chain-like spring-mass model and a 240-d.o.f. three-dimensional truss structure. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:923 / 947
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Optimal sensor placement for efficient structural health monitoring
    Azarbayejani, M.
    El-Osery, A.
    Cho, K-K.
    Taha, M. Reda
    STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING 2007: QUANTIFICATION, VALIDATION, AND IMPLEMENTATION, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2007, : 451 - 458
  • [32] An optimal sensor placement algorithm for structural health monitoring
    Xie, Q.
    Xue, S. T.
    STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING AND INTELLIGENT INFRASTRUCTURE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2006, : 965 - 969
  • [33] Optimal Sensor Placement for Response Reconstruction in Structural Dynamics
    Papadimitriou, Costas
    MODEL VALIDATION AND UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, VOL 3, 2020, : 205 - 210
  • [34] Optimal sensor placement for modal identification of repetitive structures
    Zhang, J.
    De Roeck, G.
    Reynders, E.
    Lombaert, G.
    PROCEEDINGS OF ISMA2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NOISE AND VIBRATION ENGINEERING AND USD2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UNCERTAINTY IN STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2016, : 2355 - 2364
  • [35] Optimal Multi-Type Sensor Placement for Structural Identification by Static-Load Testing
    Bertola, Numa Joy
    Papadopoulou, Maria
    Vernay, Didier
    Smith, Ian F. C.
    SENSORS, 2017, 17 (12)
  • [36] Optimal Sensor Placement for Parametric Model Identification of Electrical Networks, Part II: Estimation under Output Feedback
    Chakrabortty, Aranya
    Martin, Clyde F.
    49TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2010, : 5810 - 5815
  • [37] Optimal Placement of Virtual Masses for Structural Damage Identification
    Hou, Jilin
    Li, Zhenkun
    Zhang, Qingxia
    Zhou, Runfang
    Jankowski, Lukasz
    SENSORS, 2019, 19 (02)
  • [38] Optimal sensor placement methodology of triaxial accelerometers using combined metaheuristic algorithms for structural health monitoring applications
    Mghazli, Mohamed Oualid
    Zoubir, Zineb
    Nait-Taour, Abdellah
    Cherif, Seifeddine
    Lamdouar, Nouzha
    El Mankibi, Mohamed
    STRUCTURES, 2023, 51 : 1959 - 1971
  • [39] Sensor placement and structural damage identification from minimal sensor information
    Cobb, RG
    Liebst, BS
    AIAA JOURNAL, 1997, 35 (02) : 369 - 374
  • [40] Optimal sensor placement methodology of hydraulic control system for fault diagnosis
    Kong, Xiangdi
    Cai, Baoping
    Liu, Yonghong
    Zhu, Hongmin
    Liu, Yiqi
    Shao, Haidong
    Yang, Chao
    Li, Haojie
    Mo, Tianyang
    MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2022, 174