Penetration of radiocalcium at the margins of resin and glass ionomer dentine bonding agents in primary and permanent teeth

被引:2
|
作者
Tulunoglu, Ö
Tulunoglu, I [1 ]
Ulusu, T
Genç, Y
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Pedodont, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Univ Hacettepe, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
[3] Ankara Univ, Fac Med, Dept Biostat, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
microleakage; dentine bonding agents; radioisotope detection;
D O I
10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00029-4
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the leakage of three resin dentine bonding agents (Prime and Bond, Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, Probond) and a glass ionomer dentine bonding agent (GC Fujibond LC), in cervical cavities prepared in primary and permanent molar teeth restored with a hybrid composite resin (Tetric). Methods: Cervical cavities without a bevel at the cave-surface margins were prepared in the buccal and lingual surfaces of extracted primary and permanent molar teeth. After being restored, the teeth were stored for 1 week in a saline solution at 37 degrees C and then thermally cycled between 5 and 55 degrees C. Marginal leakage was determined subsequently using a radioactive isotope containing Ca-45 and an autoradiographic technique. Results: The results revealed that there were no statistically significant differences in microleakage of the bond between permanent and primary teeth dentine and Fuji Bond LC and Probond dentine bonding agents. The difference between permanent and primary teeth groups for gingival values of the Prime and Bond 2.1 group U = 22.5, p = 0.0355 and the Scotchbond Multipurpose group U = 24.0, p = 0.0406 were statistically significant. There were no significant differences between the occlusal and gingival microleakage values in either primary or permanent teeth with Prime and Bond 2.1, Fuji Bond LC and Probond except the difference at Scotchbond Multipurpose in primary teeth. For primary teeth gingival margins, none of the bonding systems were significantly different from the control group. Conclusions: These results indicate that although no statistically significant differences were found between test and control group values, the use of Fuji II LC in cervical cavities with cementum margins in primary teeth would provide the best resistance to microleakage among the test materials while the use of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose would provide the best resistance to microleakage in cervical cavities with cementum margins in permanent teeth. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:481 / 486
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Interaction of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements with moist dentine
    Yiu, CKY
    Tay, FR
    King, NM
    Pashley, DH
    Carvalho, RM
    Carrilho, MRO
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2004, 32 (07) : 521 - 530
  • [22] Clinical behaviour of glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth
    Espelid, I
    Tveit, AB
    Tornes, KH
    Alvheim, H
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1999, 27 (06) : 437 - 442
  • [23] Resin reinforced glass ionomer cement - an alternative bonding adhesive?
    Lim, KF
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 : 696 - 696
  • [24] ORTHODONTIC BONDING WITH GLASS-IONOMER CEMENT AND A RESIN ADHESIVE
    MILLETT, D
    GORDON, PH
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1995, 74 : 461 - 461
  • [25] BONDING AGENT INFLUENCE ON THE GLASS IONOMER - COMPOSITE RESIN BOND
    HINOURA, K
    ONOSE, H
    MOORE, BK
    PHILLIPS, RW
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1987, 66 : 132 - 132
  • [26] DECALCIFICATION AFTER BONDING WITH GLASS-IONOMER AND A RESIN ADHESIVE
    MILLETT, D
    NUNN, JH
    WELBURY, RR
    GORDON, PH
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1994, 73 : 197 - 197
  • [27] Effect of chemomechanical caries removal on bonding of resin-modified glass ionomer cement adhesives to caries-affected dentine
    Hamama, H. H. H.
    Yiu, C. K. Y.
    Burrow, M. F.
    AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, 2015, 60 (02) : 190 - 199
  • [28] Resin-modified and conventional glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth: 8-year results
    Qvist, V
    Manscher, E
    Teglers, PT
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2004, 32 (04) : 285 - 294
  • [29] CONVENTIONAL AND RESIN-STABILIZED GLASS-IONOMER RESTORATIONS IN PRIMARY TEETH - PRELIMINARY-RESULTS
    QVIST, V
    TEGLERS, PT
    MANSCHER, E
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1995, 74 : 440 - 440
  • [30] Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary teeth - A retrospective evaluation
    Croll, TP
    Bar-Zion, V
    Segura, A
    Donly, KJ
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 132 (08): : 1110 - 1116