Sustaining SBIRT in the wild: simulating revenues and costs for Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs

被引:13
|
作者
Cowell, Alexander J. [1 ]
Dowd, William N. [1 ]
Mills, Michael J. [1 ]
Hinde, Jesse M. [1 ]
Bray, Jeremy W. [2 ]
机构
[1] RTI Int, 3040 Cornwallis Rd,POB 12194, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
[2] Univ North Carolina Greensboro, Bryan Sch Business & Econ, Greensboro, NC USA
关键词
Cost; health insurance; revenue; SBIRT; screening and brief intervention; simulation; sustainability; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; BRIEF ALCOHOL INTERVENTION; BRIEF PHYSICIAN ADVICE; PRIMARY-CARE; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; PROBLEM DRINKERS; DRINKING; SETTINGS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1111/add.13650
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims To examine the conditions under which Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) programs can be sustained by health insurance payments. Design A mathematical model was used to estimate the number of patients needed for revenues to exceed costs. Setting Three medical settings in the United States were examined: in-patient, out-patient and emergency department. Components of SBIRT were delivered by combinations of health-care practitioners (generalists) and behavioral health specialists. Participants Practitioners in seven SBIRT programs who received grants from the US Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Measurements Program costs and revenues were measured using data from grantees. Patient flows were measured from administrative data and adjusted with prevalence and screening estimates from the literature. Findings SBIRT can be sustained through health insurance reimbursement in out-patient and emergency department settings in most staffing mixes. To sustain SBIRT in in-patient programs, a patient flow larger than the national average may be needed; if that flow is achieved, the range of screens required to maintain a surplus is narrow. Sensitivity analyses suggest that the results are very sensitive to changes in the proportion of insured patients. Conclusions Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs in the United States can be sustained by health insurance payments under a variety of staffing models. Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs can be sustained only in an in-patient setting with above-average patient flow (more than 2500 screens). Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs in out-patient and emergency department settings can be sustained with below-average patient flows (fewer than 125 000 out-patient visits and fewer than 27 000 emergency department visits).
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 109
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Field Supervision Training for a Screening Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) Implementation Project
    Lori L. Egizio
    Douglas C. Smith
    Kyle Bennett
    Corey Campbell
    Liliane Windsor
    Clinical Social Work Journal, 2019, 47 : 53 - 60
  • [32] Ten years of implementing screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT): Lessons learned
    Nunes, Ana P.
    Richmond, Melissa K.
    Marzano, Kelly
    Swenson, Carolyn J.
    Lockhart, Jodi
    SUBSTANCE ABUSE, 2017, 38 (04) : 508 - 512
  • [33] Patient Acceptability of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) in an Abortion Clinic Setting
    Appel, Lindsay
    Ramanadhan, Shaalini
    Hladky, Katherine
    Rawls, Courtney
    Welsh, Chris
    Terplan, Mishka
    SUBSTANCE ABUSE, 2014, 35 (02) : 209 - 209
  • [34] MAKING SUBSTANCE SCREENING, BRIEF INTERVENTION, AND REFERRAL TO TREATMENT (SBIRT) WORK IN JUVENILE DETAINMENT
    Hunter, Scott R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 60 (10): : S104 - S104
  • [35] Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) for offenders: Protocol for a pragmatic randomized trial
    Prendergast M.L.
    Cartier J.J.
    Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, 8 (1)
  • [36] Integrating Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) for Substance Use into Prenatal Care
    Jean C. Hostage
    Julia Brock
    Wendy Craig
    Debra Sepulveda
    Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2020, 24 : 412 - 418
  • [37] Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) implementation in urban underserved family medicine
    Bednar, Hannah
    Bergs, Katherine
    Serdarevic, Mirsada
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY IN MEDICINE, 2024, 59 (04): : 432 - 438
  • [38] Implementing a Statewide Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) Service in Rural Health Settings: New Mexico SBIRT
    Gonzales, Arturo
    Westerberg, Verner S.
    Peterson, Thomas R.
    Moseley, Ana
    Gryczynski, Jan
    Mitchell, Shannon Gwin
    Buff, Gary
    Schwartz, Robert P.
    SUBSTANCE ABUSE, 2012, 33 (02) : 114 - 123
  • [39] Program- and service-level costs of seven screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment programs
    Bray, Jeremy W.
    Mallonee, Erin
    Dowd, William
    Aldridge, Arnie
    Cowell, Alexander J.
    Vendetti, Janice
    SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND REHABILITATION, 2014, 5 : 63 - 73
  • [40] IMPLEMENTING SCREENING, BRIEF INTERVENTION, AND REFERRAL TO TREATMENT (SBIRT) FOR SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS IN THE SCHOOL SETTING
    Jo, Young
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 61 (10): : S211 - S211