Randomised trial of epidural bupivacaine and morphine in prevention of stump and phantom pain in lower-limb amputation

被引:201
|
作者
Nikolajsen, L
Ilkjaer, S
Christensen, JH
Kroner, K
Jensen, TS
机构
[1] AARHUS UNIV HOSP,DEPT NEUROL,DK-8000 AARHUS C,DENMARK
[2] AARHUS UNIV HOSP,DEPT ANAESTHESIOL,DK-8000 AARHUS C,DENMARK
[3] AARHUS UNIV,DANISH PAIN RES CTR,DK-8000 AARHUS C,DENMARK
来源
LANCET | 1997年 / 350卷 / 9088期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(97)06315-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Epidural analgesia before limb amputation is commonly used to reduce postamputation pain. But there have been no controlled studies with large numbers of patients to prove such a preemptive effect. We investigated whether postamputation stump and phantom pain in the first year is reduced by preoperative epidural blockade with bupivacaine and morphine. Methods In a randomised, double-blind trial, 60 patients scheduled for lower-limb amputation were randomly assigned epidural bupivacaine (0.25% 4-7 mL/h) and morphine (0.16-0.28 mg/h) for 18 h before and during the operation (29 patients; blockade group) or epidural saline (4-7 mL/h) and oral or intramuscular morphine (31 patients; control group). All patients had general anaesthesia for the amputation and were asked about stump and phantom pain after 1 week and then after 3, 6, and 12 months by two independent examiners. Study endpoints were rate of stump and phantom pain, intensity of stump and phantom pain, and consumption of opioids. Findings Two patients in each group were withdrawn before amputation. The groups were well matched in baseline characteristics. Median duration of preoperative saline treatment was 18.5 h (IQR 17-20). Median duration of preoperative epidural blockade in the blockade group was 18 h (15-20.3). The combined median duration of postoperative epidural pain treatment in both groups was 166 h (89.3-308.3). After 1 week, 14 (52%) patients in the blockade group and 15 (56%) in the control group had phantom pain (95% CI -30.6 to 22.7, p=0.9). The figures for blockade versus control group were: 14 (82%) vs ten (50%; 4.0 to 60.8, p=0.09) at 3 months; 13 (81%) vs 11 (55%; -2.7 to 55.3, p=0.2) at 6 months; and nine (75%) vs 11 (69%; -27.0 to 39.6, p=1.0) at 12 months. Intensity of stump and phantom pain and consumption of opioids were similar in both groups at all four postoperative interviews. Interpretation Perioperative epidural blockade started a median of 18 h (15-20.3) before the amputation and continued into the postoperative period does not prevent phantom or stump pain.
引用
收藏
页码:1353 / 1357
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The effect of rehabilitation therapies on quality of life and function in individuals with phantom limb pain after lower-limb amputation: A systematic review
    Gane, Elise
    Petersen, Phoebe
    Killalea, Taylor
    Glavinovic, Paige
    Nash, Isabel
    Batten, Heather
    PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 48 (04) : 431 - 440
  • [22] Phantom limb pain and etiology of amputation in unilateral lower extremity amputees
    Weiss, SA
    Lindell, B
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1996, 11 (01) : 3 - 17
  • [23] Surgical treatment of chronic phantom limb sensation and limb pain after lower limb amputation
    Prantl, Lukas
    Schreml, Stephan
    Heine, Norbert
    Eisenmann-Klein, Marita
    Angele, Peter
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 118 (07) : 1562 - 1572
  • [24] Effectiveness of software-supported and traditional mirror therapy in patients with phantom limb pain following lower limb amputation: protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial
    McAuley, James
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2015, 61 (01) : 42 - 42
  • [25] Coaptation of Cutaneous Nerves for Intractable Stump Pain and Phantom Limb Pain after Upper Limb Amputation: Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction
    Kadota, Hideki
    Ishida, Kunihiro
    STRATEGIES IN TRAUMA AND LIMB RECONSTRUCTION, 2020, 15 (01) : 50 - 53
  • [26] Stump infections after major lower-limb amputation: A 10-year retrospective study
    Dutronc, H.
    Gobet, A.
    Dauchy, F. -A.
    Klotz, R.
    Cazanave, C.
    Garcia, G.
    Lafarie-Castet, S.
    Fabre, T.
    Dupon, M.
    MEDECINE ET MALADIES INFECTIEUSES, 2013, 43 (11-12): : 456 - 460
  • [27] A Retrospective Trial Comparing the Effects of Different Anesthetic Techniques on Phantom Pain After Lower Limb Amputation
    Sahin, Sevtap Hekimoglu
    Colak, Alkin
    Arar, Cavidan
    Tutunculer, Ebru
    Sut, Necdet
    Yilmaz, Baris
    Birtane, Murat
    CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2011, 72 (03): : 127 - 137
  • [28] Pain following major lower-limb amputation within a district general hospital
    Halvey, E.
    Wahed, A.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 75 : 90 - 90
  • [29] Non-pharmacological management of phantom limb pain in lower limb amputation: a systematic review
    Othman, Rani
    Mani, Ramakrishnan
    Krishnamurthy, Ilanchezhiyan
    Jayakaran, Prasath
    PHYSICAL THERAPY REVIEWS, 2018, 23 (02) : 88 - 98
  • [30] Structural and functional motor cortex asymmetry in unilateral lower limb amputation with phantom limb pain
    Pacheco-Barrios, K.
    Pinto, C. B.
    Velez, F. G. Saleh
    Duarte, D.
    Gunduz, M. E.
    Simis, M.
    Gianlorenco, A. C. Lepesteur
    Barouh, J. L.
    Crandell, D.
    Guidetti, M.
    Battistella, L.
    Fregni, F.
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 131 (10) : 2375 - 2382