System reliability analysis: The advantages of using analytical methods to analyze non-repairable systems

被引:7
|
作者
Mettas, A [1 ]
Savva, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Reliasoft Corp, Corp R&D, Tucson, AZ 85710 USA
关键词
analytical methods; system reliability; system analysis; reliability allocation; reliability optimization; system design; importance measure; system life distribution; system warranty period; system failure rate; system MTTF; Weibull distribution;
D O I
10.1109/RAMS.2001.902446
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Most of the system analysis software available on the market today employs the use of simulation methods for estimating the reliability of non-repairable systems. Even though simulation methods are easy to apply and offer great versatility in modeling and analyzing complex systems, there are some limitations to their effectiveness. For example, if the number of simulations performed is not large enough, these methods can be error prone. In addition, performing a large number of simulations can be extremely time-consuming and simulation offers a small range of calculation results when compared to analytical methods. Analytical methods have been avoided due to their complexity in favor of the simplicity of using simulation. A software tool has been developed that calculates the exact analytical solution for the reliability of a system. Given the reliability equation for the system, further analyses on the system can be performed, such as computing exact values of the reliability, failure rate, at specific points in time, as well as computing the system MTTF (mean time to failure), and reliability importance measures for the components of the system. In addition, optimization and reliability allocation techniques can be utilized to aid engineers in their design improvement efforts. Finally, the time-consuming calculations and the non-repeatability issue of the simulation methodology are eliminated.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 85
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reliability Assessment of Combined Hardware-Software Non-repairable Time-Critical Systems
    Verma, Anjushi
    Gayen, Tirthankar
    COMPUTER JOURNAL, 2023, 66 (07): : 1644 - 1663
  • [32] Competing failure analysis in non-repairable binary systems subject to functional dependence
    Xing, Liudong
    Wang, Chaonan
    Levitin, Gregory
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART O-JOURNAL OF RISK AND RELIABILITY, 2012, 226 (O4) : 406 - 416
  • [33] Multi-objective availability optimization of a system with repairable and non-repairable components
    Zoulfaghari, H.
    Hamadani, A. Zeinal
    Ardakan, M. Abouei
    2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT (IEOM), 2015,
  • [34] Reliability assessment of non-repairable multi-state phased mission systems with backup missions
    Li, Xiang-Yu
    Xiong, Xiaoyan
    Guo, Junyu
    Huang, Hong-Zhong
    Li, Xiaopeng
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2022, 223
  • [35] Heterogeneous Non-Repairable Warm Standby Systems With Periodic Inspections
    Levitin, Gregory
    Xing, Liudong
    Dai, Yuanshun
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2016, 65 (01) : 394 - 409
  • [36] Degradation process and lifetime evaluation of repairable and non-repairable systems subject to random shocks
    Guo, Shuyang
    Sun, Yufeng
    Zhao, Guangyan
    Chen, Zhiwei
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2016 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RELIABILITY, MAINTAINABILITY AND SAFETY (ICRMS'2016): INTEGRATING BIG DATA, IMPROVING RELIABILITY & SERVING PERSONALIZATION, 2016,
  • [37] OPTIMUM DESIGN RELIABILITY OF NON-REPAIRABLE EQUIPMENTS IN EVENT OF DEFECTIVE PRODUCTION
    OESTERER, D
    1976, 49 (06): : 254 - 258
  • [38] Intelligent optimal preventive replacement maintenance policy for non-repairable systems
    Ekpenyong, Moses Effiong
    Udoh, Nse Sunday
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 190
  • [39] A Multiple-Valued Decision Diagram Based Method for Efficient Reliability Analysis of Non-Repairable Phased-Mission Systems
    Mo, Yuchang
    Xing, Liudong
    Amari, Suprasad V.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2014, 63 (01) : 320 - 330
  • [40] Reliability Evaluation of non-Repairable Propulsion Systems of Hybrid-Electric Helicopter with Different Level of Hybridization
    Bolvashenkov, Igor
    Kammermann, Joerg
    Herzog, Hans-Georg
    Zeng, Wenbin
    2019 FOURTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECOLOGICAL VEHICLES AND RENEWABLE ENERGIES (EVER), 2019,