Comparison of perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic right upper lobectomy in non-small cell lung cancer

被引:23
|
作者
Huang, Jia [1 ]
Tian, Yu [1 ]
Zhou, Qian-Jun [1 ]
Ning, Jun-Wei [1 ]
Gu, Ze-Nan [1 ]
Lu, Pei-Ji [1 ]
Li, Jian-Tao [1 ]
Lin, Hao [1 ]
Chen, Tian-Xiang [1 ]
Yang, Yun-Hai [1 ]
Kim, Min P. [2 ]
Merritt, Robert E. [3 ]
Ghisalberti, Marco [4 ]
Jiang, Long [1 ]
Luo, Qing-Quan [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Chest Hosp, Shanghai Lung Canc Ctr, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Houston Methodist Hosp, Div Thorac Surg, Dept Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Dept Surg, Div Thorac Surg, Wexner Med Ctr, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[4] Univ Hosp Siena, Thorac Surg Unit, Siena, Italy
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Lobectomy; non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); robotic; video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS); THORACIC SURGICAL LOBECTOMY; SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES; SURGERY; RESECTION;
D O I
10.21037/tlcr-21-960
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has been widely used in the treatment of lung cancer. The perioperative outcomes of right upper lobectomy (RUL) using RATS and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) were retrospectively investigated and compared. We aimed to summarize a single-center experience of RATS and 4-port unidirectional VATS in RUL, and to discuss the safety and the essentials of the surgery. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the 685 with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who underwent minimally invasive RUL in our center by the same surgical group from January 2015 to December 2019. Both RATS and VATS were performed with three ports with utility incision. The 685 participants were divided into RATS (335 cases) and VATS (350 cases) groups according to surgical method. Baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes including dissected lymph nodes, postoperative duration of drainage, postoperative hospital stay, and incidence of postoperative complications were compared between the groups. Results: In the 685 patients enrolled, the baseline characteristics were comparable, and no postoperative 30-day mortality or intraoperative blood transfusion were observed. Compared with VATS, RATS had less surgical duration (90.22 +/- 12.16 vs. 92.68 +/- 12.26 min, P<0.001), less length of stay (4.71 +/- 1.37 vs. 5.26 +/- 1.56 days, P<0.001), and decreased postoperative duration of drainage (3.49 +/- 1.15 vs. 4.09 +/- 1.57 days, P<0.001). No significant difference was observed in the lymph nodes dissection, blood loss, conversion rate and morbidities. The cost of RATS was much higher than VATS (85,329.41 +/- 12,893.44 vs. 68,733.43 +/- 14,781.32 Conclusions: Robot assisted RUL had similar perioperative outcomes compared to VATS RUL lobectomy using similar three port with utility incision technique. The advantages of RATS included finer dissection of lymph node, relatively less operation time, earlier chest tube removal and discharge.
引用
收藏
页码:4549 / 4557
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Robotic versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) Lobectomy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
    Bhora, F. Y.
    Lee, D. Y.
    Belsley, S. S.
    Wassef, M.
    Rehmani, S. S.
    Connery, C. P.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 7 (09) : S230 - S231
  • [2] Comparison of the long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic-assisted and video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for resectable non-small cell lung carcinoma
    Robert E. Merritt
    Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul
    Desmond M. D’Souza
    Peter J. Kneuertz
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2022, 16 : 1281 - 1288
  • [3] Comparison of the long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic-assisted and video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for resectable non-small cell lung carcinoma
    Merritt, Robert E.
    Abdel-Rasoul, Mahmoud
    D'Souza, Desmond M.
    Kneuertz, Peter J.
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2022, 16 (06) : 1281 - 1288
  • [4] Complete thoracoscopic lobectomy versus hybrid video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer
    Tomohiro Fujita
    Akira Koyanagi
    Koji Kishimoto
    General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2024, 72 : 31 - 40
  • [5] Complete thoracoscopic lobectomy versus hybrid video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer
    Fujita, Tomohiro
    Koyanagi, Akira
    Kishimoto, Koji
    GENERAL THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 72 (01) : 31 - 40
  • [6] Perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: A propensity score matched analysis
    Wu, Zhiqiang
    Ma, Shaohua
    THORACIC CANCER, 2023, 14 (20) : 1921 - 1931
  • [7] VIDEO-ASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC LOBECTOMY FOR THE TREATMENT OF NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER
    Jeon, Jac Hyun
    Kang, Chang Hyun
    Scong, Yong Won
    Kim, Hye Seon
    Park, In Kyu
    Kim, Young T.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 7 (11) : S448 - S449
  • [8] Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer
    Mingyon Mun
    Masayuki Nakao
    Yosuke Matsuura
    Junji Ichinose
    Ken Nakagawa
    Sakae Okumura
    General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2018, 66 : 626 - 631
  • [9] Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer
    Mun, Mingyon
    Nakao, Masayuki
    Matsuura, Yosuke
    Ichinose, Junji
    Nakagawa, Ken
    Okumura, Sakae
    GENERAL THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 66 (11) : 626 - 631
  • [10] Perioperative outcomes of robotic versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in non-small cell lung cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy
    Yao, Wangchao
    Shen, Ziyun
    Zhang, Lele
    Zhu, Xinsheng
    Xiong, Yicheng
    Teng, Meixin
    Qing, Yang
    Zhang, Jing
    Zhang, Peng
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2024, 16 (04) : 2205 - 2215