Cross-sectional study of Pfizer-sponsored clinical trials: assessment of time to publication and publication history

被引:7
|
作者
Mooney, LaVerne A. [1 ]
Fay, Lorna [1 ]
机构
[1] Pfizer Inc, Pfizer Med, New York, NY 10023 USA
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2016年 / 6卷 / 07期
关键词
MEDICAL JOURNAL EDITORS; PHASE-II; INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE; DELAYED PUBLICATION; REPORTING BIAS; REGISTRATION; RECRUITMENT; SUNITINIB; EFFICACY; CANCER;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012362
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To estimate the proportion of Pfizer-sponsored clinical trials that completed in 2010 and are published as manuscripts in the peer-reviewed literature, and to assess the manuscript development history. Design: Retrospective, cross-sectional analysis. Setting: Clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov that completed in 2010 for approved, Pfizer prescription products in patients or vaccines in healthy participants. Main outcome measures: The proportion of studies for which the primary outcome(s) was published and the median time from study completion to publication. The manuscript development history included the number of times a manuscript was submitted before it was accepted for publication. Results: Among registered clinical trials for which Pfizer was the sponsor that completed in 2010, 76 met all inclusion criteria. The primary outcome(s) for 65 (85%) studies was published in 71 manuscripts; the median time to publication was 31 months (range 3-63 months). Of the remaining 11 studies, 2 had been submitted to at least one journal, 2 had not yet been submitted and 7 had no plans to publish because the study had terminated early due to recruitment challenges. Manuscripts accepted at the first choice journal were published at median time of 28 months (range 8-63, n=31), those accepted at second choice journal were published at 32 months (3-45, n=19), and for those accepted at third choice journal, it was 40 months (range 24-53, n=13). Conclusions: The publication rate and median time to publication from study completion for Pfizer-sponsored studies were comparable to those previously reported for combined analyses of industry and non-industry sectors. Opportunities exist for sponsors, authors and journals to explore ideas that would facilitate more timely publication for clinical trial results. However, to be effective, such changes may need to revisit the entire publication process.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Success at journal of choice and effect of resubmissions on publication timing for Pfizer-sponsored publications in 2012
    Whann, Elizabeth A.
    Ring, Stephanie A.
    Leo, Courtney
    Nathan, Amy B.
    Mooney, LaVerne
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2013, 29 : S15 - S15
  • [2] Industry-sponsored clinical trials: time to publication
    Mathias, Marla
    LaFlamme, K. Elizabeth
    Johnson, Tracy H.
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2012, 28 : S12 - S12
  • [3] Publication of neurology clinical trials registered with clinical trial registry of India: A cross-sectional study
    Mishra, Biswamohan
    Agarwal, Ayush
    Nilima, Nilima
    Srivastava, M. V. Padma
    Vishnu, Venugopalan Y.
    ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2022, 146 (05): : 475 - 484
  • [4] The use of the registered reports format for publication of randomized clinical trials: A cross-sectional study
    Anthony, N.
    Tisseaux, A.
    Naudet, F.
    FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 37 : 19 - 20
  • [5] Publication bias in trials registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: Is it a problem? A cross-sectional study
    Showell, Marian
    Buckman, Sam
    Berber, Slavica
    Allah, Nada Ata
    Patterson, Ben
    Cole, Samantha
    Farquhar, Cynthia
    Jordan, Vanessa
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (01):
  • [6] Assessment of Duplicate Publication of Chinese-Sponsored Randomized Clinical Trials
    Jia, Yuanxi
    Huang, Doudou
    Wen, Jiajun
    Qureshi, Riaz
    Wang, Yehua
    Rosman, Lori
    Chen, Qingkun
    Robinson, Karen A.
    Gagnier, Joel J.
    Ehrhardt, Stephan
    Celentano, David D.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (12)
  • [7] PROTOCOL: Assessment of publication time in Campbell systematic reviews: A cross-sectional survey
    Pan, Bei
    Ge, Long
    Wei, Zhipeng
    Hou, Liangying
    Lai, Honghao
    Yang, Kehu
    CAMPBELL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2023, 19 (01)
  • [8] Non-publication of clinical trials in cardiovascular medicine: a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis
    Roddick, A.
    Zheng, S.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2017, 38 : 654 - 655
  • [9] Factors associated with non-publication of clinical trials in cardiovascular medicine: a cross-sectional analysis
    Alawajneh, M.
    Aljabai, A.
    Theeb, L.
    Badwan, Z.
    Abd Alnabi, A.
    Theeb, H.
    Altibi, A.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2024, 45
  • [10] FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH NON-PUBLICATION OF CLINICAL TRIALS IN HEART FAILURE; A CROSS-SECTIONAL ANALYSIS
    Aljabali, Ahmed
    AlAwajneh, Mohmmad M.
    Theeb, Laith
    Tashtoush, Shaden
    Alshwayyat, Sakhr
    Altibi, Ahmed
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 83 (13) : 799 - 799