Multiparameter immunophenotyping by flow cytometry as a diagnostic tool in multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance

被引:0
|
作者
Carulli, G. [1 ]
Ottaviano, V. [1 ]
Cannizzo, E. [1 ]
Giuntini, S. [1 ]
Manetti, C. [1 ]
Ciancia, E. M. [2 ]
Azzara, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Div Hematol, Pisa, Italy
[2] AOUP, Div Pathol 2, Pisa, Italy
来源
CLINICA TERAPEUTICA | 2012年 / 163卷 / 05期
关键词
immunophenotyping; multiparameter flow cytometry; monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance; multiple myeloma; MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE; PLASMA-CELLS; PHENOTYPE; CRITERIA; RISK;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Immunophenotyping by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) provides relevant information about prognosis and minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma (MM) and might be used to distinguish MM from monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance (MGUS). Materials and Methods. We evaluated a possible usage of MFC to predict the differential diagnosis between MM and MGUS. One hundred consecutive patients were studied at diagnosis and underwent conventional diagnostic procedures. We carried out a double-blind study. Immunophenotyping was performed on samples from myeloaspirates before establishing diagnosis, while the final clinical diagnosis was established independently from MFC results. A five- or six-color method was carried out by means of monoclonal antibody combinations able to identify abnormal plasma cells (CD19-) and the most relevant immunophenotypic aberrations (loss of CD27; overexpression of CD117, CD56, CD28; asynchronous expression of CD20). MFC was applied following the indications of the European Myeloma Network. When abnormal plasma cells were <= 3% of the global plasma cell population, MM was predicted; when abnormal plasma cells were >= 3.1%, MGUS was predicted. Results. MFC results predicted 63 cases of MM and 37 cases of MGUS. At the end of our study, 61 cases of MM and 39 cases of MGUS were diagnosed. Therefore, 4% of patients were misdiagnosed by MFC parameters alone, with sensitivity and specificity of 0.983 and 0.92, respectively. Conclusions. Only a small proportion of patients with MM and MGUS were misdiagnosed by MFC alone and a possible systematic application of MFC in all patient with MM and MGUS at diagnosis might be proposed. Novel additional criteria could be necessary to improve the diagnostic impact of MFC in monoclonal gammopathies. Clin Ter 2012; 163(5):387-392
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 392
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Preventive strategies in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and smoldering multiple myeloma
    Rajkumar, S. Vincent
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, 2012, 87 (05) : 453 - 454
  • [32] Role of MicroRNAs From Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance to Multiple Myeloma
    Calvo, Katherine R.
    Landgren, Ola
    Roccaro, Aldo M.
    Ghobrial, Irene M.
    SEMINARS IN HEMATOLOGY, 2011, 48 (01) : 39 - 45
  • [33] Phenotype of plasma cells in multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance
    Kovarova, L.
    Buresova, I.
    Buchler, T.
    Suska, R.
    Pour, L.
    Zahradova, L.
    Penka, M.
    Hajek, R.
    NEOPLASMA, 2009, 56 (06) : 526 - 532
  • [34] Prothrombotic abnormalities in patients with multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance
    Nielsen, Thoger
    Kristensen, Soren Risom
    Gregersen, Henrik
    Teodorescu, Elena Manuela
    Pedersen, Shona
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2021, 202 : 108 - 118
  • [35] Bone markers in patients with multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance
    Glendenning, P
    Vasikaran, SD
    INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2002, 32 (1-2) : 56 - 57
  • [36] Diagnostic utility of multiparameter flow cytometric immunophenotyping in multiple myeloma
    Paro, M. M. Kardum
    Taradi, I.
    Kristo, D. Radic
    Rogulj, I. Mandac
    Kolonic, S. Ostojic
    Kursar, M.
    Siftar, Z.
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2019, 493 : S419 - S419
  • [37] Diagnostic evaluation of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance
    Rajan, Archana M.
    Rajkumar, S. Vincent
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2013, 91 (06) : 561 - 562
  • [38] Stromal alterations in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, smoldering myeloma, and multiple myeloma
    Bogun, Lucienne
    Koch, Annemarie
    Scherer, Bo
    Fenk, Roland
    Maus, Uwe
    Bormann, Felix
    Koehrer, Karl
    Petzsch, Patrick
    Wachtmeister, Thorsten
    Zukovs, Romans
    Dietrich, Sascha
    Haas, Rainer
    Schroeder, Thomas
    Jaeger, Paul
    Geyh, Stefanie
    BLOOD ADVANCES, 2024, 8 (10) : 2575 - 2588
  • [39] Circulating serum microRNAs as novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance
    Kubiczkova, Lenka
    Kryukov, Fedor
    Slaby, Ondrej
    Dementyeva, Elena
    Jarkovsky, Jiri
    Nekvindova, Jana
    Radova, Lenka
    Greslikova, Henrieta
    Kuglik, Petr
    Vetesnikova, Eva
    Pour, Ludek
    Adam, Zdenek
    Sevcikova, Sabina
    Hajek, Roman
    HAEMATOLOGICA, 2014, 99 (03) : 511 - 518
  • [40] The diagnostic value of SE MRI and DWI of the spine in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, smouldering myeloma and multiple myeloma
    Dutoit, Julie C.
    Vanderkerken, Matthias A.
    Anthonissen, Joris
    Dochy, Frederick
    Verstraete, Koenraad L.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (11) : 2754 - 2765