Why dependent types matter

被引:9
|
作者
McKinna, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9AJ, Fife, Scotland
关键词
algorithms; design; languages; theory; verification;
D O I
10.1145/1111320.1111038
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Language designers have in recent years proposed a wealth of richer type systems for programming which seek to extend the range of statically enforced guarantees on data and code. Most such proposals have been evolutionary extensions of ML or Haskell, offering programmers a balanced compromise between expressive strength and existing well-understood technology. Typically they revolve around type- or kind-indexed types such as GADTs, supported by limited equality reasoning at the type-checking level, thus separating the dynamic behaviour of programs from the (simpler) static behaviour of indexing information occurring in their types. I want to argue in this talk for a more radical departure from such practice by examining full spectrum type dependency, lifting such restrictions on the data upon which types may depend. Conor McBride and I designed the language EPIGRAM for experiments in programming with inductive families of data (of which GADTs are a special case). Using it for illustration, I will explore some of the possibilities and challenges afforded by full spectrum type dependency at the static and dynamic level: types directly support modelling complex invariants in terms of other data (rather than their types), with a Curry-Howard flavour of data-as-evidence; such complexity is on a 'pay-as-you-go' basis, while keeping type annotations and other syntactic overheads to a minimum; data decomposition steps, e.g. case analysis, furnish more informative interactions between types and values during typechecking; such steps may moreover be abstractly specified by their types, and thus user definable; this supports a style of programming embracing "learning by testing', views, and Burstall's 'hand simulation plus a little induction'; the absence of a rigid phase distinction need not lead to type-passing or excessive run-time overhead; effectful computation, in particular partiality, can be incorporated via variations on existing ideas such as monads. This talk is based on joint work with Conor McBride, Edwin Brady and Thorsten Altenkirch.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 1
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Why meetings matter
    Jacobs, M
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2000, 78 (09) : 5 - 5
  • [42] Why Religions Matter
    Admirand, Peter
    HEYTHROP JOURNAL, 2018, 59 (03): : 626 - 627
  • [43] WHY RELIGIOUS MATTER
    Collins, Brian
    RELIGIOUS STUDIES REVIEW, 2018, 44 (03) : 316 - 316
  • [44] Why vortices matter
    Peter Gammel
    Nature, 2001, 411 : 434 - 435
  • [45] Why Dinosaurs Matter
    Bowden, Alistair
    KRONOSCOPE-JOURNAL FOR THE STUDY OF TIME, 2018, 18 (02): : 214 - 215
  • [46] Why REUs Matter
    Castillo-Garsow, Carlos
    Castillo-Chavez, Carlos
    DIRECTIONS FOR MATHEMATICS RESEARCH EXPERIENCE FOR UNDERGRADUATES, 2016, : 125 - 145
  • [47] Why standards matter
    Hoffmann, Terry
    HPAC Heating, Piping, Air Conditioning, 2000, 72 (1 SUPPL.):
  • [48] Why elections matter
    Clark, ES
    WASHINGTON QUARTERLY, 2000, 23 (03): : 27 - 40
  • [49] Why Words Matter
    Guidry, Jeanine
    Anderson, Carley
    Vachhani, Priyanka
    Grove, Linsey
    Mpody, Christian
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 108 (03) : 321 - 323
  • [50] Why We Matter
    Wilson, Scott
    JPT, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2019, 71 (03): : 55 - 56