Efficacy and safety of oral versus intranasal midazolam as premedication in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Chen, Shouming [1 ,2 ]
Lang, Bingchen [2 ,3 ]
Wu, Lan [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Wensheng [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Univ Hosp 2, Dept Anesthesiol, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Birth Defects & Related Dis Women & Childr, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Univ Hosp 2, Dept Pharm, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Translat Neurosci Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol,Lab Anesthesia & Crit Care Med, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[5] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Natl Local Joint Engn Res Ctr Translat Med Anesthe, Lab Anesthesia & Crit Care Med, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[6] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Natl Local Joint Engn Res Ctr Translat Med Anesthe, Dept Anesthesiol,Lab Anesthesia & Crit Care Med, Chengdu 610000, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Midazolam; Premedication; Anesthesia; general; Meta-analysis; Randomized controlled trials as topic; PEDIATRIC-PATIENTS; DOUBLE-BLIND; DEXMEDETOMIDINE; LIDOCAINE;
D O I
10.23736/S0375-9393.22.16937-3
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Midazolam hydrochloride is a widely accepted benzodiazepine for premedication in pediatric pa-tients. However, there is no consistent conclusion regarding which route of administration is best. We performed a meta -analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of oral versus intranasal midazolam premedication in children.EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception to June 2022, for randomized controlled trials comparing oral versus intranasal midazolam. Primary out-comes included satisfactory mask acceptance for induction and satisfactory sedation at separation from parents. Second-ary outcomes included the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, incidence of nasal irritation, postoperative recovery time, and hemodynamic changes.EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Data from 14 studies involving a total of 901 children were obtained. The results indicated that intranasal and oral midazolam premedication in children provided similar satisfactory mask acceptance for induction (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.93-1.13; P=0.64; I2=0%), satisfactory sedation at separation from parents (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.89-1.10; P=0.90; I2=57%), and postoperative recovery time (WMD,-8.01; 95% CI,-20.16-4.14; P=0.20; I2=85%). Addition-ally, intranasal midazolam premedication was associated with lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.51-0.96; P=0.03; I2=0%) and shorter onset time.CONCLUSIONS: Differences between intranasal and oral midazolam in satisfactory mask acceptance for induction, sat-isfactory sedation at separation from parents, and postoperative recovery time were not significant. Intranasal midazolam premedication was associated with shorter onset time and higher incidence of nasal irritation.(Cite this article as: Chen S, Lang B, Wu L, Zhang W. Efficacy and safety of oral versus intranasal midazolam as pre-medication in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Anestesiol 2023;89:331-40. DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.22.16937-3)
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 340
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs. oral midazolam for premedication in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Guangxuan
    Xin, Li
    Yin, Qingtang
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2023, 11
  • [2] Efficacy and safety of intranasal midazolam versus intranasal ketamine as sedative premedication in pediatric patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lang, Bingchen
    Wang, Huiqing
    Fu, Yuzhi
    Zeng, Linan
    Huang, Liang
    Zhang, Qianqian
    Chen, Shouming
    Jia, Zhi-jun
    Zhang, Lingli
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [3] Efficacy and safety of intranasal midazolam versus intranasal ketamine as sedative premedication in pediatric patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Bingchen Lang
    Huiqing Wang
    Yuzhi Fu
    Linan Zeng
    Liang Huang
    Qianqian Zhang
    Shouming Chen
    Zhi-jun Jia
    Lingli Zhang
    BMC Anesthesiology, 22
  • [4] The effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine premedication in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jun, Jong Hun
    Kim, Kyu Nam
    Kim, Ji Yoon
    Song, Shin Me
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2017, 64 (09): : 947 - 961
  • [5] Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Versus Oral Midazolam as Premedication in Anaesthesia in Children
    Purushotham, R.
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCE, 2021, 9 (07): : 457 - 459
  • [6] Comparison of Intranasal Midazolam with Oral Midazolam for Premedication in Children
    Janani
    Selvamani
    Purushotham, R.
    Bhagyavarthan, Botta
    RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 7 (06): : 2079 - 2087
  • [7] Efficacy and safety of intranasal dexmedetomidine versus oral chloral hydrate as sedatives for pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Jun
    Li, Yong
    Xiao, Shuna
    Shi, Buyun
    Xia, Zhi
    Huang, Chengjiao
    Xu, Hui
    Li, Na
    Tang, Wen
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 70 (05) : 1219 - 1224
  • [8] Efficacy and Safety of Midazolam Oral Solution for Sedative Hypnosis and Anti-anxiety in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Cheng, Xiao
    Chen, Zhe
    Zhang, Lingli
    Xu, Peipei
    Qin, Fang
    Jiao, Xuefeng
    Wang, Yiyi
    Lin, Mao
    Zeng, Linan
    Huang, Liang
    Yu, Dan
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [9] PREMEDICATION WITH ORAL MIDAZOLAM FOR VOIDING CYSTOURETHROGRAPHY IN CHILDREN - SAFETY AND EFFICACY
    ELDER, JS
    LONGENECKER, R
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1995, 164 (05) : 1229 - 1232
  • [10] Intranasal midazolam versus intravenous/rectal benzodiazepines for acute seizure control in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chhabra, Ridhi
    Gupta, Rachna
    Gupta, Lalit K.
    EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2021, 125