Classification of premolars sagittal root position and angulation for immediate implant placement: a cone beam computed tomography study

被引:1
|
作者
Zhan, Yalin [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Wang, Miaozhen [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Cheng, Xueyuan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Liu, Feng [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Clin Div 1, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Ctr Stomatol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Engn Res Ctr Oral Biomat & Digital Med Device, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Beijing Key Lab Digital Stomatol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] Minist Hlth, Res Ctr Engn & Technol Computerized Dent, Beijing, Peoples R China
[7] NMPA Key Lab Dent Mat, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
FRESH EXTRACTION SOCKETS; GUIDED BONE REGENERATION; RIDGE PRESERVATION; WALL; PROVISIONALIZATION; DIMENSIONS; PRINCIPLE; MAXILLA; TISSUE;
D O I
10.1016/j.oooo.2022.05.013
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives. Sagittal root position (SRP) and buccal plate thickness are important considerations in implant treatment planning. The objective of this study was to classify the relationship of the SRP and angulation to the osseous housing to assist treatment plan making for immediate implant placement in the premolar region. Study Design. We classified the SRP and angulations of the maxillary and mandibular premolars and measured the buccal plate thickness of 150 patients using cone beam computed tomography to support clinical decision making.Results. Regarding SRP types, 41.67%, 51.83%, 3.67%, and 2.83% of maxillary premolars and 84.33%, 15%, 0%, and 0.67% of mandibular premolars were classified as types B, M, L, and N, respectively. In terms of angulation, 20.83%, 46%, 32.17%, and 1% of maxillary premolars and 2%, 5.33%, 36.67%, and 56% of mandibular premolars were grouped into classes 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The buccal bone thickness at most locations in premolar regions was <1 mm.Conclusions. The classification of SRP and angulation will assist in treatment plan making for immediate implant placement in the premolar region. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2023;135:175-184)
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 184
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Root and canal morphology of the maxillary second premolars as indicated by cone beam computed tomography
    Olczak, Katarzyna
    Pawlicka, Halina
    Szymanski, Witold
    AUSTRALIAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2023, 49 (01) : 92 - 103
  • [22] Is Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Always Necessary for Dental Implant Placement?
    Deeb, George
    Antonos, Ludmils
    Tack, Samuel
    Carrico, Caroline
    Laskin, Daniel
    Deeb, Janina Golob
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 75 (02) : 285 - 289
  • [23] Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Study on Gender Difference and Root Canal Morphology in Mandibular Premolars
    Paul, Sukriti
    Gupta, Ankita
    Ingole, Ranu S.
    Ingole, Yogesh S.
    Vaidya, Seema B.
    Manek, Pranav, V
    Arya, Sugandha
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2024, 16 : S2321 - S2323
  • [24] Comprehensive analysis of the maxillary esthetic zone for immediate implant placement using cone beam computed tomography: A study of 352 maxillary images
    Alqutaibi, Ahmed Yaseen
    Hamadallah, Hatem Hazzaa
    Almuzaini, Abdulrahman Saad
    Aloufi, Aseel Mohammed
    Tarawah, Raneem Ahmad
    Almashraqi, Abeer
    Halboub, Esam
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2024, 131 (05): : 903e1 - 903e8
  • [25] Cone-beam computed tomography study of root and canal morphology of mandibular premolars in a western Chinese population
    Xuan Yu
    Bin Guo
    Ke-Zeng Li
    Ru Zhang
    Yuan-Yuan Tian
    Hu Wang
    Tao Hu DDS
    BMC Medical Imaging, 12
  • [26] A cone-beam computed tomography study of root canal morphology of maxillary and mandibular premolars in a Turkish population
    Ok, Evren
    Altunsoy, Mustafa
    Nur, Bilge Gulsum
    Aglarci, Osman Sami
    Colak, Mehmet
    Gungor, Enes
    ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2014, 72 (08) : 701 - 706
  • [27] Cone-beam computed tomography study of root and canal morphology of mandibular premolars in a western Chinese population
    Yu, Xuan
    Guo, Bin
    Li, Ke-Zeng
    Zhang, Ru
    Tian, Yuan-Yuan
    Wang, Hu
    Hu, Tao
    BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2012, 12
  • [28] Horizontal alteration of anterior alveolar ridge after immediate implant placement: A retrospective cone beam computed tomography analysis
    Hyun, Young Keun
    Lee, Chung Yun
    Keerthana, Subramanian
    Ramasamy, Selvaponpriya
    Song, So-Yeon
    Shim, Ji Suk
    Ryu, Jae Jun
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2021, 13 (02): : 117 - 125
  • [29] Comparison of mesiodistal root angulation with posttreatment panoramic radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography
    Bouwens, Daniel G.
    Cevidanes, Lucia
    Ludlow, John B.
    Phillips, Ceib
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2011, 139 (01) : 126 - 132
  • [30] Cone Beam Computed Tomography Assessment of the Buccal Bone Thickness in Anterior Maxillary Teeth: Relevance to Immediate Implant Placement
    Gakonyo, Joseph
    Mohamedali, Adnaan Jabir
    Mungure, Edward Kabubei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2018, 33 (04) : 880 - 887