Psychometric Analysis of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)

被引:0
|
作者
Miley, Emilie N. [1 ,2 ]
Casanova, Madeline P. [3 ,4 ]
Pickering, Michael A. [5 ]
Cheatham, Scott W. [5 ]
Larkins, Lindsay W. [5 ]
Cady, Adam C. [6 ]
Baker, Russell T. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Inst Sports Sci & Med, Dept Hlth Nutr & Food Sci, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[2] Tallahassee Orthoped Clin, Tallahassee, FL 32308 USA
[3] Univ Idaho, WWAMI Med Educ Program, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
[4] Univ Idaho, Idaho Off Underserved & Rural Med Res, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
[5] Univ Idaho, Dept Movement Sci, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
[6] Kaiser Permanente, Woodland Hills, CA 91367 USA
关键词
total hip arthroplasty; confirmatory factor analysis; multi-group invariance testing; latent growth-curve modeling; COEFFICIENT ALPHA; SHORT-FORM; VALIDATION; RELIABILITY; VERSION; WOMAC;
D O I
10.3390/healthcare12171789
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Survey (HOOS) was developed as a region- and disease-specific outcome to assess hip disability. Despite the use of the HOOS in clinical practice and research, psychometric analyses of the scale in a large dataset of patients have not been performed. As such, the purposes of this study were to assess the structural validity of the HOOS in patients who underwent a total hip arthroplasty. Data were obtained from the Surgical Outcome System (SOS) global registry. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to assess the scale structure of the 40-item HOOS and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to identify a parsimonious scale structure. The parsimonious model identified was subjected to multi-group and longitudinal invariance testing and LGC modeling. The original five-factor, 40-item HOOS did not meet recommended model fit indices values (CFI = 0.822, TLI = 0.809, IFI = 0.822, RMSEA = 0.085). Alternate model generation identified an alternative model (i.e., HOOS-9). Sound model fit was identified for the HOOS-9 (CFI = 0.974, TLI = 0.961, RMSEA = 0.046). Invariance testing criteria were also met between groups (i.e., age and sex) and across time. Lastly, a nonlinear growth trajectory was identified in responses pertaining to hip disability. The original scale structure of the 40-item HOOS was not supported. The HOOS-9 met contemporary model fit recommendations, along with multi-group and longitudinal invariance testing. Our findings support the preliminary use of the HOOS-9 to assess hip function and disability in research and clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Normative Data of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, JR in a Healthy United States Population
    Raja, Avais
    Jenkins, Asher
    Reams, Megan
    Horst, Patrick K.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2019, 34 (06): : 1122 - 1126
  • [42] Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the hip dysfunction and osteoarthritis outcome score-physical function short form (HOOS-PS)
    Cavalheiro, Luis M.
    Goncalves, Rui S.
    Martins, Elisabete
    Pires, Joao
    Ferreira, Pedro L.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2016, 25 : 137 - 137
  • [43] Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis and Total Hip Replacement: Adaption and Validation of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Source LK 2.0 (HOOS 2.0) to the Portuguese Culture (MT)
    Cavalheiro, Luis
    Gil, Joao N.
    Nunes, Sandra
    Ferreira, Pedro L.
    Goncalves, Rui S.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2012, 20 : 79 - 79
  • [44] Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Values in Asymptomatic and Arthritic Cohorts
    Yu, Raymond W.
    McLean, James M.
    Bahl, Jasvir S.
    Solomon, Lucian B.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2019, 42 (02) : E216 - E224
  • [45] Development and Validation of Crosswalks Between the Western Ontario & McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement/ Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement
    Fleisher, Ilan T.
    Thompson, Madison C.
    Mensah, Curtis J.
    Joseph, Amethia D.
    McLawhorn, Alexander S.
    Padgett, Douglas E.
    Lyman, Stephen
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2022, 37 (06): : 1034 - +
  • [46] Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Romanian Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement
    Haragus, Horia
    Deleanu, Bogdan
    Prejbeanu, Radu
    Timar, Bogdan
    Levai, Codrina
    Vermesan, Dinu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2019, 31 (04) : 307 - 311
  • [47] HOW WELL DO THE NEW 12-ITEM HIP DISABILITY AND OSTEOARTHRITIS OUTCOME SCORE AND KNEE INJURY AND OSTEOARTHRITIS OUTCOME SCORE PERFORM IN MEASURING JOINT REPLACEMENT OUTCOMES?
    Ackerman, I. N.
    Soh, S-E
    Harris, I. A.
    Cashman, K.
    Heath, E.
    Lorimer, M.
    Graves, S. E.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2021, 29 : S219 - S220
  • [48] Rasch Analysis of Joint Replacement Version for Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome in Individuals With Advanced Osteoarthritis of Hip Awaiting Total Hip Arthroplasty Surgery
    Mehta, Saurabh P.
    Ellis, Ashley Paige
    Meadows, Samantha
    Lu, Steve
    Bullock, Matthew
    Oliashirazi, Ali
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2023, 104 (12): : 2084 - 2091
  • [49] Minimal important change in the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions in adults with hip osteoarthritis after 12 weeks of exercise
    Cheret, Eric P. B. M.
    Mechlenburg, Inger
    Skou, Soren T.
    Dalgas, Ulrik
    Stisen, Martin Gade
    Kjeldsen, Troels
    MUSCULOSKELETAL SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2025, 76
  • [50] Linking Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short Form and PROMIS Physical Function
    Heng, Marilyn
    Stern, Brocha Z.
    Tang, Xiaodan
    Schalet, Benjamin D.
    Collins, Austin K.
    Chen, Antonia F.
    Bedair, Hany S.
    O'Brien, Todd M.
    Sisodia, Rachel C.
    Franklin, Patricia D.
    Cella, David
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2022, 30 (15) : E1043 - E1050