Psychometric Analysis of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)

被引:0
|
作者
Miley, Emilie N. [1 ,2 ]
Casanova, Madeline P. [3 ,4 ]
Pickering, Michael A. [5 ]
Cheatham, Scott W. [5 ]
Larkins, Lindsay W. [5 ]
Cady, Adam C. [6 ]
Baker, Russell T. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Inst Sports Sci & Med, Dept Hlth Nutr & Food Sci, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[2] Tallahassee Orthoped Clin, Tallahassee, FL 32308 USA
[3] Univ Idaho, WWAMI Med Educ Program, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
[4] Univ Idaho, Idaho Off Underserved & Rural Med Res, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
[5] Univ Idaho, Dept Movement Sci, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
[6] Kaiser Permanente, Woodland Hills, CA 91367 USA
关键词
total hip arthroplasty; confirmatory factor analysis; multi-group invariance testing; latent growth-curve modeling; COEFFICIENT ALPHA; SHORT-FORM; VALIDATION; RELIABILITY; VERSION; WOMAC;
D O I
10.3390/healthcare12171789
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Survey (HOOS) was developed as a region- and disease-specific outcome to assess hip disability. Despite the use of the HOOS in clinical practice and research, psychometric analyses of the scale in a large dataset of patients have not been performed. As such, the purposes of this study were to assess the structural validity of the HOOS in patients who underwent a total hip arthroplasty. Data were obtained from the Surgical Outcome System (SOS) global registry. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to assess the scale structure of the 40-item HOOS and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to identify a parsimonious scale structure. The parsimonious model identified was subjected to multi-group and longitudinal invariance testing and LGC modeling. The original five-factor, 40-item HOOS did not meet recommended model fit indices values (CFI = 0.822, TLI = 0.809, IFI = 0.822, RMSEA = 0.085). Alternate model generation identified an alternative model (i.e., HOOS-9). Sound model fit was identified for the HOOS-9 (CFI = 0.974, TLI = 0.961, RMSEA = 0.046). Invariance testing criteria were also met between groups (i.e., age and sex) and across time. Lastly, a nonlinear growth trajectory was identified in responses pertaining to hip disability. The original scale structure of the 40-item HOOS was not supported. The HOOS-9 met contemporary model fit recommendations, along with multi-group and longitudinal invariance testing. Our findings support the preliminary use of the HOOS-9 to assess hip function and disability in research and clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] QUALITATIVE STUDY TO UNDERSTAND THE PATIENT EXPERIENCE OF KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS (OA) AND ASSESS THE CONTENT VALIDITY OF THE KNEE INJURY AND OSTEOARTHRITIS OUTCOME SCORE (KOOS) AND HIP DISABILITY AND OSTEOARTHRITIS OUTCOME SCORE (HOOS) MEASURES
    Chen, W. H.
    Panter, C.
    Park, J.
    Mason, B.
    Findley, A.
    Arbuckle, R.
    Svedsater, H.
    Chauhan, D.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2021, 24 : S143 - S143
  • [22] TRANSLATION, CULTURAL ADAPTATION, AND PSYCHOMETRIC TESTING OF THE HIP DISABILITY AND OSTEOARTHRITIS OUTCOME SCORE INTO YORUBA LANGUAGE
    Fatoye, F.
    Adekilekun, J. F.
    Gebrye, T.
    Fatoye, C.
    Oyewole, O. O.
    Mbada, C.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (12) : S412 - S413
  • [23] HIP DISABILITY AND OSTEOARTHRITIS OUTCOME SCORES (HOOS) ARE DIRECTLY RELATED TO GAIT VARIABLES IN SUBJECTS WITH HIP PAIN
    Chabra, S.
    Foucher, K. C.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2013, 21 : S100 - S101
  • [24] Item selection for 12-item short forms of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-12) and Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS-12)
    Gandek, B.
    Roos, E. M.
    Franklin, P. D.
    Ware, J. E., Jr.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2019, 27 (05) : 746 - 753
  • [25] A 12-item short form of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS-12): tests of reliability, validity and responsiveness
    Gandek, B.
    Roos, E. M.
    Franklin, P. D.
    Ware, J. E., Jr.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2019, 27 (05) : 754 - 761
  • [26] Validation of the Dutch version of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
    de Groot, I. B.
    Reijman, M.
    Terwee, C. B.
    Bierma-Zeinstra, S.
    Favejee, M. M.
    Roos, E.
    Verhaar, J. A.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2009, 17 (01) : 132 - 132
  • [27] Validation of the Dutch version of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
    de Groot, I. B.
    Reijman, M.
    Terwee, C. B.
    Bierma-Zeinstra, S. M. A.
    Favejee, M.
    Roos, E. M.
    Verhaar, J. A. N.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2007, 15 (01) : 104 - 109
  • [28] Assessment of reliability, validity, responsiveness and minimally important change of the German Hip dysfunction and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip
    Dariusch Arbab
    Johannes H. M. van Ochten
    Christoph Schnurr
    Bertil Bouillon
    Dietmar König
    Rheumatology International, 2017, 37 : 2005 - 2011
  • [29] Mapping and Crosswalk of the Oxford Hip Score and Different Versions of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
    Putman, Sophie
    Preda, Cristian
    Girard, Julien
    Duhamel, Alain
    Migaud, Henri
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2021, 479 (07) : 1534 - 1544
  • [30] Multi-Directional Crosswalk of the Harris Hip Score and the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
    Cho, Chan Hee
    Costi, Kerry
    Sharma, Deepti
    Thewlis, Dominic
    Solomon, Lucian B.
    Callary, Stuart A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2025, 14 (05)