Lightweight fruit detection algorithms for low-power computing devices

被引:1
|
作者
Lawal, Olarewaju Mubashiru [1 ]
Zhao, Huamin [2 ]
Zhu, Shengyan [1 ]
Liu, Chuanli [1 ]
Cheng, Kui [1 ]
机构
[1] Yibin Univ, Sanjiang Inst ofArtificial Intelligence & Robot, Sichuan 644000, Peoples R China
[2] Shanxi Agr Univ, Coll Agr Engn, Jinzhong, Peoples R China
关键词
computer vision; image recognition; object detection; FABRIC DEFECT DETECTION; SURFACE;
D O I
10.1049/ipr2.13098
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
A lightweight fruit detection algorithm is important to ensure real-time detection on low-power computing devices while maintaining detection accuracy. In addition, the fruit detection algorithm is also faced with some environmental factors. To solve these challenges, lightweight detection algorithms termed YOLO-Lite, YOLO-Liter and YOLO-Litest were developed based on the YOLOv5 framework. The compared mean average precision (mAP) detection revealed that YOLO-Lite at 0.86 is 2%, 4%, 5%, 7%, and 16% more than YOLO-Liter and YOLOv5n at 0.84 each, YOLOv4-tiny at 0.82, YOLO-Liter at 0.81, YOLO-MobileNet at 0.79, and YOLO-ShuffleNet at 0.70, respectively, but not for YOLOv8n at 0.87. On the Computer platform, except for YOLOv4-tiny at 178.6 frames per second (FPS), the speed of YOLO-Litest at 158.7 FPS is faster than YOLO-Liter at 129.9 FPS, YOLO-Lite at 120.5 FPS, YOLO-ShuffleNet at 119.0 FPS, YOLOv8n at 116 FPS, YOLOv5n at 111.1 FPS, and YOLO-MobileNet at 89.3 FPS. Using Jetson Nano, the 32.3 FPS of YOLO-Litest is faster than other algorithms, but not YOLOv4-tiny's 34.1 FPS. On the Raspberry Pi 4B, YOLO-Litest with 4.69 FPS, outperformed other algorithms. The choices for an accurate and faster detection algorithm are YOLO-Lite and YOLO-Litest respectively, while YOLO-Liter maintains a balance between them.
引用
收藏
页码:2318 / 2328
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On the Lightweight McEliece Cryptosystem for Low-Power Devices
    Ivanov, Fedor
    Krouk, Evgenii
    Kreshchuk, Alexey
    2019 XVI INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM PROBLEMS OF REDUNDANCY IN INFORMATION AND CONTROL SYSTEMS (REDUNDANCY), 2019, : 133 - 138
  • [2] Lightweight iris segmentation network for low-power devices
    Huo, Guang
    Lin, Dawei
    Gai, Di
    Yuan, Meng
    Pei, Tianpeng
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC IMAGING, 2022, 31 (03)
  • [3] Clustering Algorithms on Low-Power and High-Performance Devices for Edge Computing Environments
    Lapegna, Marco
    Balzano, Walter
    Meyer, Norbert
    Romano, Diego
    SENSORS, 2021, 21 (16)
  • [4] Low-Power Testing for Low-Power Devices
    Wen, Xiaoqing
    2010 IEEE 25TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON DEFECT AND FAULT TOLERANCE IN VLSI SYSTEMS (DFT 2010), 2010, : 261 - 261
  • [5] Low-power spatial computing using dynamic threshold devices
    Beckett, P
    2005 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS (ISCAS), VOLS 1-6, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 2345 - 2348
  • [6] Lightweight Strawberry Instance Segmentation on Low-Power Devices for Picking Robots
    Cao, Leilei
    Chen, Yaoran
    Jin, Qiangguo
    ELECTRONICS, 2023, 12 (14)
  • [7] A lightweight single object tracking algorithm for low-power embedded devices
    Zhang, Yunxin
    Wu, Jun
    Chen, Honglin
    Xu, Jiajing
    Huang, Zhen
    2024 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND COMPUTING, ICMLC 2024, 2024, : 642 - 648
  • [8] Networking Low-Power Energy Harvesting Devices: Measurements and Algorithms
    Gorlatova, Maria
    Wallwater, Aya
    Zussman, Gil
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MOBILE COMPUTING, 2013, 12 (09) : 1853 - 1865
  • [9] Networking Low-Power Energy Harvesting Devices: Measurements and Algorithms
    Gorlatova, Maria
    Wallwater, Aya
    Zussman, Gil
    2011 PROCEEDINGS IEEE INFOCOM, 2011, : 1602 - 1610
  • [10] A Lightweight Low-Power Model for the Detection of Plant Leaf Diseases
    Akuthota U.C.
    Abhishek
    Bhargava L.
    SN Computer Science, 5 (4)